Study characteristics |
Methods |
Study design: RCT
Setting: Netherlands, healthcare
Exercise groups: 1
Comparison groups: 1 |
Participants |
Number of participants: 222 (E1 = 112, C1 = 110)
Chronic LBP duration: Not specified (not specified)
Neurological/radicular symptoms: Not specified
Mean age (years): 42
Sex (female): 49% |
Interventions |
Exercise Group 1 (E1): Postural exercises (Cesar therapy); type = other (co‐ordination); duration = 12 weeks; dose = low; design = not specified; delivery = individual; additional intervention = not specified
Comparison Group 1 (C1): Usual care/no treatment (usual general practitioner care) |
Outcomes |
Core outcomes reported: Global Perceived Health or Recovery (Global Perceived Health or Recovery (global improvement (recovered))
Follow‐up time periods available for syntheses: 12 weeks (short) |
Notes |
Conflicts of interest: Not reported
Funding source: Not reported
Other: Sufficient data not available for inclusion in meta‐analyses |
Risk of bias |
Bias |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) |
Low risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) |
Low risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes |
High risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
Blinding of care provider (performance bias) |
High risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes |
High risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes |
High risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
Participants analysed in group allocated (attrition bias) |
Low risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) |
Unclear risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
Groups similar at baseline (selection bias) |
Low risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
Co‐interventions avoided or similar (performance bias) |
Low risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
Compliance acceptable in all groups (performance bias) |
Low risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
Timing of outcome assessment similar in all groups (detection bias) |
Unclear risk |
Support for judgement is not available |