| Study characteristics |
| Methods |
Study design: RCT
Setting: France, occupational
Exercise groups: 2
Comparison groups: 0 |
| Participants |
Number of participants: 85 (E1 = 43, E2 = 42)
Chronic LBP duration: Not specified (not specified)
Neurological/radicular symptoms: Not specified
Mean age (years): 40
Sex (female): 33% |
| Interventions |
Exercise Group 1 (E1): Functional restoration; type = functional restoration; duration = 5 weeks; dose = high; design = partially individualised; delivery = group; additional intervention = psychological therapy
Exercise Group 2 (E2): Active individual therapy (strengthening, stretching, aerobics recommended); type = mixed; duration = 5 weeks; dose = low; design = partially individualised; delivery = individual; additional intervention = advice/education & psychological therapy |
| Outcomes |
Core outcomes reported: Pain (Visual Analogue Scale); function (Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale); work (sick leave days at 6 months)
Follow‐up time periods available for syntheses: 24 weeks (moderate) |
| Notes |
Conflicts of interest: None to declare
Funding source: Union Regionale des Caisses d’Assurance Maladie des Pays de Loire
Other: None |
| Risk of bias |
| Bias |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) |
Low risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes |
High risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
| Blinding of care provider (performance bias) |
High risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes |
High risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes |
Low risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
| Participants analysed in group allocated (attrition bias) |
Low risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) |
Low risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
| Groups similar at baseline (selection bias) |
High risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
| Co‐interventions avoided or similar (performance bias) |
Unclear risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
| Compliance acceptable in all groups (performance bias) |
Low risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
| Timing of outcome assessment similar in all groups (detection bias) |
Low risk |
Support for judgement is not available |
