Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 28;2021(9):CD009790. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009790.pub2

Kader 2012.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: RCT
Setting: United Kingdom, not specified
Exercise groups: 3
Comparison groups: 0
Participants Number of participants: 63 (E1 = 20, E2 = 22, E3 = 21)
Chronic LBP duration: Not specified (not specified)
Neurological/radicular symptoms: Some participants
Mean age (years): Not reported
Sex (female): Not reported
Interventions Exercise Group 1 (E1): Mulligan and McKenzie mobilisation techniques, deep core strengthening, swimming and walking; type = mixed; duration = 10 weeks; dose = high; design = not specified; delivery = individual; additional intervention = advice/education & other & physiotherapy
Exercise Group 2 (E2): Gym ball exercise including intense use of a gym ball in the clinic and at home; type = core strengthening; duration = 10 weeks; dose = high; design = partially individualised; delivery = individual; additional intervention = advice/education
Exercise Group 3 (E3): Home exercise at least 3 times weekly (walking and cycling); type = aerobic; duration = 10 weeks; dose = high; design = standardised; delivery = independent; additional intervention = anti‐inflammatory/analgesics
Outcomes Core outcomes reported: Pain (McGill Pain Score); function (Oswestry Disability Index); HRQoL (36‐Item Short Form Survey)
Follow‐up time periods available for syntheses: 10 weeks (short)
Notes Conflicts of interest: Not reported
Funding source: Not reported
Other: None
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk The randomisation process was not stratified.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomised using sealed envelopes to one of three treatment groups
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Assumed not possible
Blinding of care provider (performance bias) High risk Assumed not possible
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes High risk Participants completed questionnaires.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Support for judgement was not available.
Participants analysed in group allocated (attrition bias) Unclear risk Not described
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Support for judgement was not available.
Groups similar at baseline (selection bias) Unclear risk Stated that "The three groups were similar at trial entry" but no statistics were presented
Co‐interventions avoided or similar (performance bias) Unclear risk Not described
Compliance acceptable in all groups (performance bias) Unclear risk Not described
Timing of outcome assessment similar in all groups (detection bias) Low risk Support for judgement was not available.