Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 28;2021(9):CD009790. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009790.pub2

Mannion 1999.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: RCT
Setting: Switzerland, general population
Exercise groups: 3
Comparison groups: 0
Participants Number of participants: 148 (E1 = 50, E2 = 49, E3 = 49)
Chronic LBP duration: 566 weeks (long)
Neurological/radicular symptoms: No participants
Mean age (years): 45
Sex (female): 57%
Interventions Exercise Group 1 (E1): Aerobics, stretching; type = aerobic & stretching; duration = 12 weeks; dose = high; design = standardised; delivery = group; additional intervention = none
Exercise Group 2 (E2): Controlled progressive exercises with machines, David Beck Clinic programme (functional restoration); type = functional restoration; duration = 12 weeks; dose = high; design = partially individualised; delivery = group; additional intervention = none
Exercise Group 3 (E3): Exercises using TheraBand's and general strength training and home exercise (as part of physiotherapy); type = strengthening; duration = 12 weeks; dose = low; design = individualised; delivery = individual; additional intervention = advice/education
Outcomes Core outcomes reported: Pain (Visual Analogue Scale); function (Roland‐Morris Disability Questionnaire)
Follow‐up time periods available for syntheses: 12 weeks (short); 26 weeks (moderate); 52 weeks (long)
Notes Conflicts of interest: Device status category: 1
Funding source: Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant No. 32‐50979.97); Schulthess Klinik Research Fund; DBC International
Other: None
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Support for judgement is not available
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Support for judgement is not available
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Support for judgement is not available
Blinding of care provider (performance bias) Low risk Support for judgement is not available
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Support for judgement is not available
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Support for judgement is not available
Participants analysed in group allocated (attrition bias) Low risk Support for judgement is not available
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Support for judgement is not available
Groups similar at baseline (selection bias) Low risk Support for judgement is not available
Co‐interventions avoided or similar (performance bias) Low risk Support for judgement is not available
Compliance acceptable in all groups (performance bias) Low risk Support for judgement is not available
Timing of outcome assessment similar in all groups (detection bias) Low risk Support for judgement is not available