Study characteristics |
Methods |
Study design: RCT
Setting: Nigeria, healthcare
Exercise groups: 1
Comparison groups: 1 |
Participants |
Number of participants: 30 (E1 = 15, C1 = 15)
Chronic LBP duration: Not specified (not specified)
Neurological/radicular symptoms: Not specified
Mean age (years): 55
Sex (female): 67% |
Interventions |
Exercise Group 1 (E1): Aerobic dance; type = aerobic; duration = 6 weeks; dose = high; design = standardised; delivery = not specified; additional intervention = advice/education & manual therapy & heat/ice & anti‐inflammatory/analgesics
Comparison Group 1 (C1): Other conservative treatment (physical therapy) |
Outcomes |
Core outcomes reported: Pain (Visual Analogue Scale); function (Roland‐Morris Disability Questionnaire); HRQoL (Nottingham Health Profile Questionnaire)
Follow‐up time periods available for syntheses: 6 weeks (short) |
Notes |
Conflicts of interest: Not reported
Funding source: Not reported
Other: None |
Risk of bias |
Bias |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
Participants were randomised into two groups. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
Not described |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes |
High risk |
Assumednot possible |
Blinding of care provider (performance bias) |
High risk |
Assumed not possible |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes |
High risk |
Assumed not possible |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes |
Unclear risk |
Not described |
Participants analysed in group allocated (attrition bias) |
Unclear risk |
Not described |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) |
Low risk |
Support for judgement was not available. |
Groups similar at baseline (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
Only age mentioned |
Co‐interventions avoided or similar (performance bias) |
Unclear risk |
Not described |
Compliance acceptable in all groups (performance bias) |
Unclear risk |
Not described |
Timing of outcome assessment similar in all groups (detection bias) |
Low risk |
Support for judgement was not available. |