Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 28;2021(9):CD009790. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009790.pub2

Olivier 2008.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: RCT
Setting: France, healthcare
Exercise groups: 2
Comparison groups: 0
Participants Number of participants: 90 (E1 = 30, E2 = 30)
Chronic LBP duration: Not specified (not specified)
Neurological/radicular symptoms: Not specified
Mean age (years): Not reported
Sex (female): Not reported
Interventions Exercise Group 1 (E1): Intensive functional rehabilitation programme: flexibility, endurance, and strengthening exercises for all major muscle groups, daily isokinetic training of the trunk muscles; type = mixed; duration = 4 weeks; dose = high; design = partially individualised; delivery = group; additional intervention = relaxation
Exercise Group 2 (E2): Intensive functional rehabilitation programme: flexibility, endurance, and strengthening exercises for all major muscle groups; type = mixed; duration = 4 weeks; dose = high; design = partially individualised; delivery = group; additional intervention = relaxation
Outcomes Core outcomes reported: Pain (Visual Analogue Scale); function (Dallas Pain Questionnaire)
Follow‐up time periods available for syntheses: 4 weeks (short); 12 weeks (short)
Notes Conflicts of interest: Not reported
Funding source: Not reported
Other: Sufficient data not available for inclusion in meta‐analyses
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Support for judgement was not available.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Support for judgement was not available.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Support for judgement was not available.
Blinding of care provider (performance bias) High risk Support for judgement was not available.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes High risk Support for judgement was not available.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk Support for judgement was not available.
Participants analysed in group allocated (attrition bias) High risk Support for judgement was not available.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Support for judgement was not available.
Groups similar at baseline (selection bias) Unclear risk Support for judgement was not available.
Co‐interventions avoided or similar (performance bias) Low risk Support for judgement was not available.
Compliance acceptable in all groups (performance bias) Low risk Support for judgement was not available.
Timing of outcome assessment similar in all groups (detection bias) Low risk Support for judgement was not available.
Other bias Unclear risk Not available: non‐English publication