Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 28;2021(9):CD009790. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009790.pub2

Paolucci 2012.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: RCT
Setting: Italy, healthcare
Exercise groups: 1
Comparison groups: 1
Participants Number of participants: 30 (E1 = 15, C1 = 15)
Chronic LBP duration: Not specified (not specified)
Neurological/radicular symptoms: Some participants
Mean age (years): Not reported
Sex (female): Not reported
Interventions Exercise Group 1 (E1): Stretching of the trunk muscles, erector spine and abdominal reinforcement, postural exercises; type = stretching & strengthening; duration = 4 weeks; dose = low; design = standardised; delivery = group; additional intervention = advice/education
Comparison Group 1 (C1): Other conservative treatment (back school)
Outcomes Core outcomes reported: Pain (McGill Pain Score)
Follow‐up time periods available for syntheses: 4 weeks (short)
Notes Conflicts of interest: None to declare
Funding source: Not reported
Other: None
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Thirty individuals, referred to an academic hospital, were enrolled in this study and randomised into two groups.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Not described
Blinding of care provider (performance bias) High risk Not described
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Not described
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk No dropouts
Participants analysed in group allocated (attrition bias) Low risk No dropouts
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Support for judgement was not available.
Groups similar at baseline (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Co‐interventions avoided or similar (performance bias) Unclear risk Not described
Compliance acceptable in all groups (performance bias) Unclear risk Not described
Timing of outcome assessment similar in all groups (detection bias) Low risk Support for judgement was not available.