Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 28;2021(9):CD009790. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009790.pub2

Sung 2013.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: RCT
Setting: South Korea, general population
Exercise groups: 2
Comparison groups: 0
Participants Number of participants: 46 (E1 = 25, E2 = 21)
Chronic LBP duration: Not specified (moderate)
Neurological/radicular symptoms: No participants
Mean age (years): 50
Sex (female): 48%
Interventions Exercise Group 1 (E1): Five core stabilisation exercises; type = core strengthening; duration = 4 weeks; dose = low; design = partially individualised; delivery = independent with follow‐up; additional intervention = none
Exercise Group 2 (E2): Five spinal flexibility exercises; type = flexibility/mobilising; duration = 4 weeks; dose = low; design = partially individualised; delivery = independent with follow‐up; additional intervention = none
Outcomes Core outcomes reported: Function (Oswestry Disability Index)
Follow‐up time periods available for syntheses: 4 weeks (short)
Notes Conflicts of interest: Not reported
Funding source: Cleveland State University; Korea University and the Basic Science Research Program, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2010‐0003015)
Other: None
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk The randomisation procedure was conducted by a computer program.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Assumed not possible
Blinding of care provider (performance bias) High risk Assumed not possible
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes High risk Assumed not possible
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Figure 3
Participants analysed in group allocated (attrition bias) High risk Support for judgement was not available.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Support for judgement was not available.
Groups similar at baseline (selection bias) Low risk Overall, there were no differences between groups in age, height, body weight or the months since pain onset.
Co‐interventions avoided or similar (performance bias) Unclear risk Not described
Compliance acceptable in all groups (performance bias) Unclear risk Adherence was mentioned as being measured but not reported on.
Timing of outcome assessment similar in all groups (detection bias) Low risk Support for judgement was not available.