Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 28;2021(9):CD009790. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009790.pub2

Tritilanunt 2001.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: RCT
Setting: Thailand, healthcare
Exercise groups: 2
Comparison groups: 0
Participants Number of participants: 72 (E1 = 36, E2 = 36)
Chronic LBP duration: 150 weeks (moderate)
Neurological/radicular symptoms: Not specified
Mean age (years): 41
Sex (female): 78%
Interventions Exercise Group 1 (E1): Aerobic exercises; type = aerobic; duration = 12 weeks; dose = high; design = standardised; delivery = not specified; additional intervention = advice/education
Exercise Group 2 (E2): Flexion and postural exercises; type = flexibility/mobilising; duration = 12 weeks; dose = high; design = standardised; delivery = not specified; additional intervention = advice/education & psychological therapy
Outcomes Core outcomes reported: Pain (Visual Analogue Scale)
Follow‐up time periods available for syntheses: 12 weeks (short)
Notes Conflicts of interest: Not reported
Funding source: Not reported
Other: None
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Support for judgement is not available
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Support for judgement is not available
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Support for judgement is not available
Blinding of care provider (performance bias) High risk Support for judgement is not available
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes High risk Support for judgement is not available
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Support for judgement is not available
Participants analysed in group allocated (attrition bias) High risk Support for judgement is not available
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Support for judgement is not available
Groups similar at baseline (selection bias) Low risk Support for judgement is not available
Co‐interventions avoided or similar (performance bias) Unclear risk Support for judgement is not available
Compliance acceptable in all groups (performance bias) Unclear risk Support for judgement is not available
Timing of outcome assessment similar in all groups (detection bias) Low risk Support for judgement is not available