Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 28;2021(9):CD009790. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009790.pub2

Williams 2009.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: RCT
Setting: USA, mixed
Exercise groups: 1
Comparison groups: 1
Participants Number of participants: 90 (E1 = 43, C1 = 47)
Chronic LBP duration: Not specified (long)
Neurological/radicular symptoms: No participants
Mean age (years): 48
Sex (female): 77%
Interventions Exercise Group 1 (E1): Iyengar yoga; type = yoga; duration = 24 weeks; dose = high; design = standardised; delivery = group; additional intervention = none
Comparison Group 1 (C1): Usual care/no treatment (control group: continued with normal activity and treatment)
Outcomes Core outcomes reported: Pain (Visual Analogue Scale); function (Oswestry Disability Index)
Follow‐up time periods available for syntheses: 24 weeks (moderate); 50 weeks (long)
Notes Conflicts of interest: None to declare
Funding source: National Institutes of Health’s National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine grant (no.1 R21 AT001679‐01A2)
Other: Information modified for author contact; SDs imputed
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Eligible participants were given envelopes with randomly generated group assignment and enrolled in one of four cohorts of 20 to 28 participants each.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Author contact: changed to yes; they used envelopes
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Not described
Blinding of care provider (performance bias) High risk Not described
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Participants were asked to return at 12 (midway), 24 (immediately after), and 48 weeks (six‐month follow‐up) after the start of the intervention.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Sixteen participants (12 from the yoga group) did not complete the 24‐week protocol.
Participants analysed in group allocated (attrition bias) Low risk For intention‐to‐treat analyses, missing baseline data were replaced by group means while missing data at 12 and 24 weeks were replaced.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Support for judgement was not available.
Groups similar at baseline (selection bias) Low risk More African‐Americans were enrolled in the yoga versus control groups.
Co‐interventions avoided or similar (performance bias) Low risk Agreed to not get chiropractic treatment, massage therapy, Pilates, or acupuncture or to participate in any other yoga programme
Compliance acceptable in all groups (performance bias) Low risk On average, yoga completers attended 88.5% of classes and 87.1% completed home practice.
Timing of outcome assessment similar in all groups (detection bias) Low risk Support for judgement was not available.