Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 17;20(3):222–227. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_48_20

Table 3.

Comparison of study participants’ sociodemographic and clinical characteristics with their mean knowledge, attitude, practice score

Variable Good KAP Poor KAP P
HbA1C
 Good 75 (18.8) 32 (8) <0.001
 Bad 77 (19.2) 216 (54)
Gender
 Male 60 (15) 107 (26.8) 0.470
 Female 92 (23) 141 (32.2)
Educational status
 Educated 150 (37.5) 185 (46.2) <0.001*
 Not educated 2 (0.5) 63 (15.8)
Employment status
 Employed 133 (33.2) 163 (40.8) <0.001
 Not employed 19 (4.8) 85 (21.2)
Monthly income ($)
 <50 70 (17.5) 185 (46.2) <0.001
 ≥50 82 (20.5) 63 (15.8)
Site of residence
 Urban 109 (27.2) 194 (48.5) 0.140
 Rural 43 (10.8) 54 (13.5)
Type of diabetes
 Type 1 22 (5.5) 30 (7.5) 0.493
 Type 2 130 (32.5) 218 (54.5)

KAP=Knowledge, attitude, practice, HbA1C=Glycated hemoglobin