| Primary criteria | Rationale |
| 1. Presence of Anopheles gambiae/A. coluzzii | Major vector; target of GEM production |
| 2. Geographic isolation | Containment of GEMs |
| 3. Genetic isolation | Containment of transgene constructs |
| 4. Genetic diversity | Potential detriment to GEM function |
| 5. Island size | Feasibility vs. validity |
| 6. Topography | Evaluation of GEM dispersal capacity |
| 7. Anopheline species richness | Logistics; HGT*; confound epi. endpoints |
| Other considerations | Rationale |
| 1. Insecticide susceptibility/resistance | Match GEM to indigenous mosquitoes |
| 2. Plasmodium prevalence | Estimation of epidemiological impact |
| 3. Presence of endangered species | Potential for negative GEM interactions |
| 4. Travel feasibility | Operational logistics and cost |
Abbreviation: HGT, horizontal gene transfer.