Table 1. Read counts and mapping rates for random-primed versus Tiled-ClickSeq approaches.

Sample	CT	ClickSeq reads	Virus mapped	% Viral Reads	Tiled v1 reads	Virus mapped	% Viral Reads
WRCEVA_00501	12.9	4,665,869	116,036	2.5%	2,359,795	2,204,750	93.4%
WRCEVA_00502	12.9	4,989,513	118,260	2.4%	1,962,581	1,820,925	92.8%
WRCEVA_00505	12.7	3,894,325	71,809	1.8%	2,779,672	2,482,854	89.3%
WRCEVA_00506	12.5	4,979,989	108,532	2.2%	2,395,750	2,148,256	89.7%
WRCEVA_00507	12.9	5,659,073	161,059	2.8%	2,056,670	1,867,012	90.8%
WRCEVA_00508	16.8	3,987,009	91,452	2.3%	1,787,418	1,433,005	80.2%
WRCEVA_00509	17.1	4,057,928	57,424	1.4%	2,202,661	1,856,633	84.3%
WRCEVA_00510	16.2	5,328,829	65,281	1.2%	2,040,332	1,601,544	78.5%
WRCEVA_00513	16.0	4,391,175	69,169	1.6%	1,641,213	1,455,991	88.7%
WRCEVA_00514	12.9	4,340,084	84,211	1.9%	2,089,241	1,902,748	91.1%
WRCEVA_00515	15.7	5,416853	102,179	1.9%	2,205,166	1,915,129	86.8%
WRCEVA_00516	17.4	4,290,929	61,017	1.4%	1,988,939	1,715,448	86.2%