Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021 Jul 29;179:108991. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108991

Table 4 -.

Association of baseline plasma ceramides with risk of incident T2DM.

Ceramides Incident T2DM Hazard ratio (95% CI) n = 37/1128 Model 1 P value Incident T2DM Hazard ratio (95% CI) n = 37/1128 Model 2 P value
C14:0 0.90 (0.62 – 1.30) 0.56 0.92 (0.63 – 1.33) 0.65
C16:0 0.74 (0.51 – 1.09) 0.13 0.78 (0.53 – 1.16) 0.22
C18:0 1.49 (1.10 – 2.01) 0.01 1.53 (1.12 – 2.08) 0.01
C18:1 0.97 (0.68 – 1.39) 0.88 1.01 (0.71 – 1.44) 0.97
C20:0 1.20 (0.87 – 1.66) 0.27 1.26 (0.90 – 1.75) 0.18
C23:0 1.02 (0.74 – 1.42) 0.90 1.07 (0.78 – 1.47) 0.69
C24:0 0.91 (0.65 – 1.28) 0.59 0.98 (0.70 – 1.39) 0.92
C24:1 1.00 (0.71 – 1.39) 0.97 1.05 (0.75 – 1.47) 0.79
C16:0/24:0 0.87 (0.54 – 1.40) 0.57 0.84 (0.52 – 1.36) 0.48
C18:0/16:0 1.63 (1.27 – 2.10) <0.001 1.63 (1.26 – 2.10) <0.001
C18:0/24:0 1.19 (1.01 – 1.40) 0.04 1.15 (0.97 – 1.36) 0.11
C24:1/24:0 1.05 (0.83 – 1.33) 0.69 1.02 (0.80 – 1.29) 0.88

Cox proportional hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for risk of incident T2DM per standard deviation (SD) increment in z-score of ceramides.

Model 1: adjusted for age and sex.

Model 2: additionally adjusted for hypertension, dyslipidemia, and vascular burden.