Table 2.

Pupae productivity in Vigo populations.

VIGO	F mother	F offs.	n	Productivity ± se	δ ± se	Reference
Base population
Gen. 0					1.85	Inferred IP LC2016
Gen. 22	0	0	71	101.97 ± 2.38	1.744 ± 0.112	LC2016
	0.375	0.5	99	47.56 ± 2.11
Gen. 50	0	0	147	45.94 ± 1.01	1.395 ± 0.136	LC2016
	0.25	0.375	145	29.71 ± 0.96
Gen. 103	0	0	22	95.32 ± 4.39	0.666 ± 0.188	LC2016
	0.375	0.5	38	71.24 ± 5.33
Gen. 111a	0	0	227	87.30 ± 2.08	0.609 ± 0.109	LC2016
	0.25	0.375	251	72.16 ± 1.83
Gen. 125	0	0	388	64.35 ± 0.70	0.115 ± 0.069	This study
	0.25	0.375	252	62.08 ± 1.18
Lines
Gen. 0 (g.86 BP)					0.92	Inferred IP LC2016
Gen. 25 (g.111 BP)	0	0	239	89.49b ± 1.66	0.728 ± 0.111	This study
	0.25	0.375	230	71.28 ± 2.05
Gen. 39 (g.125 BP)	0	0	283	58.35 ± 0.79	−0.046 ± 0.063	This study
	0.25	0.375	315	59.19 ± 0.89

F: coefficient of inbreeding in mothers and offspring, n: number of pairs evaluated, se: standard error of productivity means, δ: estimate of inbreeding load with standard error (se) obtained by bootstrapping, inferred IP: values of inbreeding load inferred by the Inbreeding–Purging model (García-Dorado 2012), BP: base population, LC2016: López-Cortegano et al. (2016).

^aResults corresponding to generation 3 of experiment A of Domínguez-García et al. (2019).

^bValue reported by LC2016.