. 2021 Jan 3;58(12):4587–4597. doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04946-w

Table 4.

Proximate analysis (%), pH, TVBN (mg N/100 g), WHC (%) and cook loos (%) of chicken fed by different level of MW

Treatment	Protein	Fat	Ash	Moisture	pH	TVB-N	WHC
Chicken fed 24 days by different level of MW
C	21.04 ± 1.48	1.71 ± 0.69	2.07^a ± 0.13	75.16 ± 0.40	6.06^a ± 0.01	30.50^c ± 2.95	76.12 ^a ± 0.30
M1	21.43 ± 1.18	1.84 ± 0.99	1.92^a ± 0.49	74.81 ± 0.29	6.06^a ± 0.01	32.00^b ± 2.07	76.62 ^a ± 0.59
M2	21.50 ± 1.28	1.67 ± 0.48	1.60^b ± 0.14	75.22 ± 0.72	5.78^b ± 0.01	33.00^b ± 2.83	73.93 ^b ± 0.64
M3	21.64 ± 2.65	1.77 ± 0.56	1.18^c ± 0.42	75.00 ± 0.94	5.96^b ± 0.13	35.50^a ± 3.54	71.60^c ± 0.40
Sig	NS	NS	p < 0.05	NS	p < 0.05	p < 0.05	p < 0.05
Chicken fed 24 days by different level of MW and 18 days without MW
C	21.48 ± 1.18	2.52^a ± 0.28	1.38^b ± 0.99	74.63 ± 0.17	6.13 ± 0.09^a	29.30 ± 0.42	57.32^a ± 0.01
M1	21.38 ± 0.19	1.55^b ± 0.02	1.43^b ± 0.64	74.64 ± 0.09	5.72 ± 0.01^b	28.55 ± 0.71	54.06^b ± 0.09
M2	22.12 ± 0.31	1.41^b ± 0.42	1.55^a ± 0.65	74.92 ± 0.75	5.86 ± 0.06^b	30.51 ± 0.71	53.65^b ± 0.42
M3	22.25 ± 0.73	1.24^c ± 0.70	1.75^a ± 0.55	74.80 ± 0.19	5.76 ± 0.07^b	29.55 ± 0.71	52.05^b ± 0.07
Sig	NS	p < 0.05	p < 0.05	NS	p < 0.05	NS	p < 0.05

Values are mean of 3 analyses. C control sample, M1 chicken fed with 1% MW, M2 chicken fed with 2% MW, M3 chicken fed with 3% MW. NS not significant