Skip to main content
. 1999 May;37(5):1419–1425. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.5.1419-1425.1999

TABLE 3.

Performance of E-MTD, by patient, after resolution of discrepancies and modification of interpretive results

Parametera E-MTD result No. of patients with MTBC culture result of:
Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%)b NPV (%)c
Positive Negative
Resolved
 Overall Positive 20 4 90.9 99.1 83.3 99.6
Negative 2 460
 AFB+ Positive 10 0 100 100 100 100
Negative 0 5
 AFB Positive 10 4 83.3 99.1 71.4 99.6
Negative 2 455
With expanded equivocal zone
 Overall Positive 20 1 90.9 99.8 95.2 99.6
Negative 2 463
 AFB Positive 10 1 83.3 99.8 90.9 99.6
Negative 2 458
a

AFB+, positive smear for AFB; AFB, negative smear for AFB. Data and performance characteristics for smear-positive patients are the same for both categories. For the second category, the equivocal zone was changed from 30,000 to 500,000 RLU to 30,000 to 1 million RLU. 

b

PPV, positive predictive value. 

c

NPV, negative predictive value.