TABLE 3.
Performance of E-MTD, by patient, after resolution of discrepancies and modification of interpretive results
| Parametera | E-MTD result | No. of patients with MTBC culture result of:
|
Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%)b | NPV (%)c | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | ||||||
| Resolved | |||||||
| Overall | Positive | 20 | 4 | 90.9 | 99.1 | 83.3 | 99.6 |
| Negative | 2 | 460 | |||||
| AFB+ | Positive | 10 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Negative | 0 | 5 | |||||
| AFB− | Positive | 10 | 4 | 83.3 | 99.1 | 71.4 | 99.6 |
| Negative | 2 | 455 | |||||
| With expanded equivocal zone | |||||||
| Overall | Positive | 20 | 1 | 90.9 | 99.8 | 95.2 | 99.6 |
| Negative | 2 | 463 | |||||
| AFB− | Positive | 10 | 1 | 83.3 | 99.8 | 90.9 | 99.6 |
| Negative | 2 | 458 | |||||
AFB+, positive smear for AFB; AFB−, negative smear for AFB. Data and performance characteristics for smear-positive patients are the same for both categories. For the second category, the equivocal zone was changed from 30,000 to 500,000 RLU to 30,000 to 1 million RLU.
PPV, positive predictive value.
NPV, negative predictive value.