Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 15;12:745109. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.745109

Table 3.

Association of differentiation phenotypes with response in clinical trials.

Cancer Differentiation phenotype Corresponding subtype Association with response Reference
Melanoma CD27+ Tscm and Tcm Unsubstantial (6)
Melanoma CD28+ All Unsubstantial (6)
Melanoma CD45RA+ Tscm, Teff and Temra Unsubstantial (6)
Melanoma CD45RO+ Tcm and Tem Unsubstantial (6)
Neuroblastoma CD45RO+CD62L+ Tcm Phenotype percentage - CAR-T persistence (p ≤ 0.055), CAR-T persistence – TTP (p=0.02) (7)
Melanoma CD8+CD27+  Tn, Tscm and Tcm CR vs. (PR+NR) p=0.001, (CR+PR) vs. NR p<0.001 (9)
Biliary tract cancer CD45RO+CD62L+CCR7+ Tcm CR/SD vs. PD, p=0.0464 (10)
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia CD8+CD27+CD45RO- Tscm CR/PRTD vs. PR/NR p=0.0009 (5)
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia CD8+CD45RO-CCR7+CD45RA+CD62L+CD27+CD28+IL7Rα+CD95+ CD8+ Tscm CR vs. NR p=0.0008, CR/PRTD vs. PR/NR p=0.0055, CR vs. PR p=0.0121 (5)
Multiple myeloma CD8+CD45RO-CD27+  Tscm ≥PR vs. <PR, p=0.0121 (8)
Pancreatic carcinoma CD45RO+CD62L+CCR7+ Tcm PR/SD vs. PD p=0.0468 (11)
Melanoma CD8+CD39-CD69- Stem-like CD8 T cells CR vs. NR, p<0.01 (100)
Melanoma CD39-CD69- Stem-like T cells CR vs. NR, p=0.0096 (100)
LBCL CD8+CCR7+CD27+ CD8+ Tscm and Tcm CR vs. PR/PD, p<2.2×10-16 (101)