Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Cardiol. 2021 Jan 4;42(3):590–596. doi: 10.1007/s00246-020-02519-4

Table 3.

Published risk of AVNRT recurrence in pediatric cohorts.

First Author Year N % SVT recurrence Mean# follow-up duration, months Mean# age, years Ablation energy
Siebels18 2018 379 14 55 ± 40 13 RF
Karacan17 2018 275 4 26 ± 14 11 Cryo
Balli16 2018 109 1 13 ± 6 10 Cryo
Tuzcu15 2017 125 10 (6-mm tip)
8 (8-mm tip)
15 ± 8 14 Cryo
Reddy14 2017 117 11 (control)
0 (voltage mapping)
22 ± 17 (control)
15 ± 7 (voltage mapping)
14 Cryo
Backhoff13 2016 241 4–11, depending on duration of follow-up 12–96 13 (median) Cryo/RF
Reddy12 2015 239 1 48 ± 24 8 (young cohort) 15 (old cohort) Cryo/RF
Kubus11 2014 205 9–16, depending on era 14 (IQR 6–22) 15 (median) RF
Drago10 2014 202 11 18–25, depending on subject age 12 Cryo
Qureshi9 2013 51 2 31 ± 10 14 Cryo
Das8 2012 246 7 24 ± 2 13 Cryo
Silver7 2010 70 3 12 ± 3 15 Cryo
Drago6 2010 74 7 30 (range 2–74) 11 Cryo
LaPage5 2010 61 7 36 ± 12 13 Cryo
Fishberger4 2010 65 0 33 ± 17 12 RF
Czosek3 2010 58 2 12 16 (median) Cryo

Cryo = cryoablation; RF = radiofrequency; ± denotes the reported standard deviation.

#

All data were drawn from the primary publication and rounded to the nearest whole number. Where median data were reported by the authors, data are reported here with interquartile range (IQR) or range instead of standard deviation.