Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 7;10(9):574–590. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.109.BJR-2020-0443.R1

Table III.

Included studies.

Study Year Time Type of study Level of evidence Location Patients, n Hips, n Male, n Female, n Mean age, yrs Follow-up, mths
Arthroscopy
Kunze et al26 2020 Retrospective Comparative trial 3 USA 310 310 120 190 34 60
Lindmann et al27 2020 Prospective Case series 4 Sweden 64 84 52 12 24 60
Öhlin et al28 2020 Prospective Case series 4 Sweden 184 225 110 74 38 60
Ortiz-Declet et al29 2020 Prospective Case series 4 USA 34 34 15 19 20.8 47.4
Bolia et al30 2019 Retrospective Comparative trial 3 USA 99 126 72 54 38 87.6 (SD 32.4)
Hassebrock et al31 2019 Retrospective Comparative trial 3 USA 133 133 47 86 31.96 24
Kierkegaard et al32 2019 Prospective Cohort study with a cross-sectional comparison 3 Denmark 56 72 24 32 36 12
Perets et al33 2019 Prospective Case series 4 USA 295 327 108 219 32.4 68.7
de Girolamo et al34 2018 Retrospective Comparative trial 3 Italy 109 109 64 54 39.3 and 38.3 96
Kaldau et al35 2018 Retrospective Case series 4 Denmark 84 84 45 39 40.4 82.9
Mansell et al36 2018 Prospective RCT 1 USA 66 66 39 21 30.3 24
Tahoun et al37 2018 Prospective Case series 4 Egypt 23 23 18 5 40.9 38.4 (SD 7.0)
Zimmerer et al38 2018 Prospective Case series 4 Germany 43 43 31 12 25 24.4
Menge et al39 2017 Retrospective Comparative trial 3 USA 154 154 80 74 40.6 120
Murata et al40 2017 Retrospective Comparative trial 3 Japan 74 74 43 31 28.3 and 39.7 24
Tjong et al41 2017 Prospective Case series 4 USA 86 106 36 50 38.1 37.2
Degen et al42 2016 Retrospective Case series 4 USA 70 86 70 0 22.5 16.8
Hufeland et al43 2016 Retrospective Case series 4 Germany 44 44 24 20 34.3 66.3 (SD 14.5)
Joseph et al44 2016 Prospective Cohort study 2 USA 64 64 19 45 31.6 and 31.1 24
Dippmann et al45 2014 Prospective Case series 4 Denmark 76 76 27 49 38 12
Gicquel et al46 2014 Prospective Case series 4 France 51 53 19 32 31 55.2 (50.4 to 66)
Gupta et al47 2014 Prospective Case series 4 USA 47 47 28 19 37 28.32 (24 to 41)
Nielsen et al48 2014 Prospective Case series 4 Denmark 117 117 48 69 37 40 (24 to 60)
Domb et al49 2013 Prospective Matched-pair comparative study 2 USA 20 20 4 16 19.6 25.5
Krych et al50 2013 Prospective RCT 1 USA 36 36 0 36 38 and 39 32 (12 to 48)
Malviya et al51 2013 Prospective Case series 4 UK 80 92 50 30 35.7 16.8 (12 to 21.6)
Zingg et al52 2013 Prospective Comparative trial 3 Switzerland 23 23 18 5 27.6 12
Larson et al53 2012 Prospective Cohort study 3 USA 90 94 56 38 32 and 28 42 (24 to 72)
Palmer et al54 2012 Prospective Case series 4 USA 185 201 99 102 40.2 46
Philippon et al55 2012 Prospective Case series 4 USA 153 153 72 81 57 35.7 (12 to 64)
Byrd and Jones56 2011 Prospective Case series 4 USA 200 200 148 52 28.6 24
Haviv et al57 2010 Retrospective Case series 4 Israel 166 170 132 34 37 22 (12 to 72)
Horisberger et al58 2010 Prospective Case series 4 Switzerland 88 105 60 28 40.9 27.6 (15.6 to 49.2)
Philippon et al59 2009 Prospective Case series 4 USA 112 112 50 62 40.6 27.6 (24 to 34.8)
AMO approach
Skowronek et al60 2017 Retrospective Cohort study 4 Poland 39 39 25 14 29.3 45 (24 to 55)
Ezechieli et al61 2016 Prospective Comparative trial 3 A - Germany
B - Italy
72 72 38 34 A - 36
B - 28.5
15 (6 to 24)
Srinivasan et al62 2013 Retrospective Cohort study 4 UK 25 26 11 15 31.3 22.3
Chiron et al63 2012 Prospective Cohort study 4 France 106 118 92 16 34.4 26.4 (12 to 54)
Ribas et al64 2010 Prospective Cohort study 4 Spain 105 107 79 38 37 12
Nepple et al65 2009 Retrospective Comparative trial 3 USA 25 25 17 8 33 20.4
SHD
Kockara et al66 2018 Retrospective Cohort study 4 Turkey 33 34 19 14 34.5 72
İnan et al67 2016 Retrospective Cohort study 4 Turkey 21 22 7 14 33.8 48
Hingsammer et al68 2015 Retrospective Cohort study 4 Switzerland 23 30 18 5 24.3 19.2 (9.6 to 36)
Steppacher et al69 2014 Retrospective Cohort study 4 Switzerland 75 97 55 42 32 72 (60 to 84)
Domb et al49 2013 Prospective Comparative trial 3 USA 10 10 2 8 19 24.8
Zingg et al52 2013 Prospective Comparative trial 3 Switzerland 15 15 11 4 28.9 12
Jäger et al70 2011 Prospective Cohort study 4 Germany 21 21 7 15 36.3 12
Naal et al71 2011 Retrospective Cohort study 4 Switzerland 22 30 22 0 19.7 45.1 (12 to 79)
Yun et al72 2009 Retrospective Cohort study 4 South Korea 14 15 12 2 35.8 27.6 (12 to 120)
Espinosa et al73 2006 Retrospective Comparative trial 3 Switzerland 52 60 33 19 30 24

AMO, anterior mini open approach; RCT, randomized controlled trial; SD, standard deviation; SHD, surgical hip dislocation.