Supplementary Table 2.
Risk of Bias Assessment by Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist
| Author | Year | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Damiani | 2021 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | Yes | NA | NA |
| Deepak | 2021 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Geisen | 2021 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Kennedy | 2021 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Wong | 2021 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Boyarsky | 2021 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | NA | No | Yes | Yes |
| Kappelman | 2021 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Furer | 2021 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Shenoy | 2021 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Haidar | 2021 | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Haberman | 2021 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Mahil | 2021 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Simon | 2021 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Al-Janabi | 2021 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Bugatti | 2021 | Unclear | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Braun-Moscovici | 2021 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Demoulin | 2021 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Seyahi | 2021 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Na | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear |
| Ruddy | 2021 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Mrak | 2021 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Chung | 2021 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Benucci | 2021 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Spiera | 2021 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Ammitzbøll | 2021 | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Medeiros-Ribeiro | 2021 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Dailey | 2021 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
NOTE. Q1: Is it clear in the study what is the “cause” and what is the “effect” (ie, there is no confusion about which variable comes first)?; Q2: Were the participants included in any comparisons similar?; Q3: Were the participants included in any comparisons receiving similar treatment/care, other than the exposure or intervention of interest?; Q4: Was there a control group?; Q5: Were there multiple measurements of the outcome both pre and post the intervention/exposure?; Q6: Was follow-up complete and if not, were differences between groups in terms of their follow-up adequately described and analyzed?; Q7: Were the outcomes of participants included in any comparisons measured in the same way?; Q8: Were outcomes measured in a reliable way?; Q9: Was appropriate statistical analysis used?
NA, not applicable.