Skip to main content
Journal of Lipid Research logoLink to Journal of Lipid Research
. 2021 Sep 29;62:100129. doi: 10.1016/j.jlr.2021.100129

The roles of lipids in SARS-CoV-2 viral replication and the host immune response

Katherine N Theken 1,2,3, Soon Yew Tang 1,2, Shaon Sengupta 2,4, Garret A FitzGerald 1,2,5,
PMCID: PMC8480132  PMID: 34599996

Abstract

The significant morbidity and mortality associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection has underscored the need for novel antiviral strategies. Lipids play essential roles in the viral life cycle. The lipid composition of cell membranes can influence viral entry by mediating fusion or affecting receptor conformation. Upon infection, viruses can reprogram cellular metabolism to remodel lipid membranes and fuel the production of new virions. Furthermore, several classes of lipid mediators, including eicosanoids and sphingolipids, can regulate the host immune response to viral infection. Here, we summarize the existing literature on the mechanisms through which these lipid mediators may regulate viral burden in COVID-19. Furthermore, we define the gaps in knowledge and identify the core areas in which lipids offer therapeutic promise for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Supplementary key words: lipidomics, lipid metabolism, cholesterol, eicosanoids, phospholipids, sphingolipids, viral infection, COVID-19, coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2

Abbreviations: AA, arachidonic acid; ACE2, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; cysLT, cysteinyl leukotriene; DC, dendritic cell; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; IAV, influenza A virus; IPr, IP receptor; LA, linoleic acid; LOX, lipoxygenase; LPL, lysophospholipid; MERS-CoV, Middle East respiratory syndrome related coronavirus; NPC1, NPC intracellular cholesterol transporter 1; PG, prostaglandin; PGI2, prostacyclin; RO, replication organelle; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; S, spike; S1P, sphingosine-1-phosphate; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; SK, sphingosine kinase; SR-B1, scavenger receptor B type 1; Tx, thromboxane


Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has infected more than 190 million people and accounted for over 4 million deaths worldwide in this pandemic. This public health challenge has underscored the need to limit viral replication and manage the immunological response to infection. Initially thought of as a respiratory pathogen, it is now well accepted that COVID-19 leads to multisystem dysfunction, including considerable cardiovascular, renal, and central pathology, as well as thrombotic and vascular complications.

While the COVID-19 pandemic is a global public health crisis of unprecedented proportions, even before this, seasonal infections with influenza and other viral pathogens were responsible for significant morbidity and mortality. While each pathogen has its unique characteristics that contribute to pathology and host response, they share some common features. Most viral respiratory infections, except for adenoviruses, are caused by RNA viruses. This includes influenza viruses, coronaviruses, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), human metapneumovirus, parainfluenza viruses, and rhinoviruses. Symptoms might range from mild upper respiratory illness to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In most cases, the virus is limited to the upper respiratory tract, spreading to the more distal alveolar epithelium in severe infection. The host must either reduce the pathogen burden (antiviral resistance) or control the adverse effects of the infection on the host's health (disease tolerance) to overcome the infection. Unfortunately, in the process of mounting an effective antiviral response, several proinflammatory signaling cascades are activated. The host may clear the virus only to succumb to the tissue damage that is sustained because of the antiviral response. Host tolerance pathways, on the other hand, may act to suppress the immune response to limit inflammation-induced damage to the host.

Viruses interact with lipid membranes to infect a cell and reprogram lipid metabolism to fuel replication. Furthermore, viral infection stimulates the production of bioactive lipid mediators that mediate the host immune response—both by inducing more inflammation and by regulating the tissue damage. The aim of this review is to summarize our knowledge with a view to elucidating the role of lipids in the pathophysiology of COVID-19, thus highlighting the gaps in knowledge and therapeutic opportunities.

Lipids in viral entry

As obligate intracellular pathogens, viruses interact with host lipids throughout their life cycle (Fig. 1). While many of the pathways involved are specific to a particular virus or family of viruses, others generalize across multiple families of viruses and thus may be potential targets for development of broad-spectrum antiviral agents. There are many reviews summarizing the role of lipids in viral entry and replication (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). Here, we highlight a few examples with emphasis on SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Interactions between coronaviruses and host lipids, including receptor binding and fusion, remodeling of endoplasmic reticulum–derived membranes to form replication organelles, and alterations in lipid metabolism to promote viral replication. Created with BioRender.com.

Viruses use various strategies to cross the plasma membrane to enter the host cell. Some nonenveloped viruses can induce membrane lysis, generate pores, or hijack cellular transport vesicles to enter target host cells (6). Other viruses enter host cells via apoptotic mimicry by incorporating phosphatidylserine into their lipid envelopes, as external presentation of this phospholipid is an apoptotic signal for phagocytes to initiate cell clearance (7). Most enveloped viruses infect host cells via either direct fusion of their envelopes with plasma membranes or receptor-mediated endocytosis (8). In the case of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, viral fusion is initiated by binding of the viral spike (S) protein to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). This is followed by proteolytic cleavage at the S1/S2 boundary by transmembrane serine protease 2 at the plasma membrane or cathepsins in the lysosome, inducing a conformational shift in the S2 subunit that interacts with the membrane to promote viral fusion (9, 10). For SARS-CoV, it has been shown that the S protein must be palmitoylated to interact with the host membrane and promote viral fusion (11, 12). Similarly, S-acylation of the S protein by ZDHHC20 is essential for SARS-CoV-2 infectivity, stabilizing the S protein and facilitating its interaction with lipid bilayers (13). Thus, the host zDHHC enzymes that catalyze the S-acylation of viral proteins may be potential drug targets (14).

Viruses can also utilize lipoprotein receptors to enter the host cell. This has been extensively studied for hepatitis C virus, which can enter cells via the LDL receptor or the HDL receptor scavenger receptor B type 1 (SR-B1) (1, 15, 16). It has also been reported that the SARS-CoV-2 S protein can bind cholesterol in HDL particles, and that uptake of HDL by SR-B1 facilitates viral entry into cells that coexpress the ACE2 receptor (17). Blocking SR-B1 prevents SARS-CoV-2 infection in multiple cell types in vitro (18).

The success of the fusion process also depends upon the composition of the viral envelope and host membrane because the biophysical properties of the various lipid species affect membrane fluidity and curvature. For example, phosphatidylethanolamine and cholesterol enhance membrane fluidity and promote negative curvature that are critical for viral fusion, while lysophospholipids (LPLs) promote positive curvature and inhibit fusion (19). Thus, agents that modify the lipid content of the viral envelope may have utility as broad-spectrum antivirals. One such compound, LJ001, is a membrane-intercalating photosensitizer that exhibits antiviral activity in vitro. Upon light activation, LJ001 generates singlet oxygen that oxidizes unsaturated phospholipids to enhance membrane rigidity and decrease viral fusion (20). Although both the viral envelope and host cell membranes would become oxidized in the presence of LJ001, the host cell can synthesize new lipids to repair its membrane, while the viral envelope is static, which enhances specificity for the virus and prevents cytotoxicity (21). The utility of LJ001 in vivo is limited because of its need for photoactivation and poor pharmacokinetic properties, but it may serve as a lead compound for the development of novel antivirals with a similar mechanism of action (20). Another potential class of broad-spectrum antiviral compounds that target lipid membranes includes rigid amphipathic fusion inhibitors, nucleoside analogs that intercalate in lipid membranes and inhibit the formation of negative curvature (22). Most importantly, in contrast to fusion inhibitors that target viral proteins (23), fusion inhibitors that act on lipid membranes would theoretically exhibit broader antiviral activity with less potential for development of resistance.

Lipid rafts, discrete membrane microdomains enriched in cholesterol and glycosphingolipids, contain high concentrations of cell surface receptors and can serve as platforms to localize the endocytosis machinery. Consequently, they play an important role in facilitating viral entry (24). Depletion of cholesterol with methyl-β-cyclodextrins decreases viral entry for several coronaviruses, including mouse hepatitis virus (25, 26), avian infectious bronchitis virus (27), and SARS-CoV (28, 29, 30). ACE2 has also been shown to colocalize with lipid rafts in host cell membranes (29, 30), although this has been disputed (28). Although glycosphingolipids can function as coreceptors for some viruses (e.g., HIV (31, 32) and influenza A virus [IAV] (33, 34)), this has not been observed for SARS-CoV-2 or other coronaviruses. Sphingomyelin in lipid rafts can be hydrolyzed by acid and neutral sphingomyelinases to ceramide, a lipid that promotes negative curvature and enhances membrane fluidity. Ceramide molecules self-associate to create ceramide-enriched membrane platforms, which cluster receptors and are involved in cell signaling and membrane trafficking (3, 35, 36). Thus, some viruses exploit ceramide-enriched membrane platforms, as in the case of rhinoviruses that activate acid sphingomyelinase to facilitate entry into the cell (37, 38).

In addition to their role in mediating viral fusion, lipids can affect viral entry by altering conformation of either the host or viral receptor. Inhibition of the serine palmitoyltransferase complex, which catalyzes the first and rate-limiting step in de novo ceramide and sphingolipid biosynthesis, altered the conformation of the murine norovirus receptor (CD300lf) such that the virus was unable to bind and infect the cell. This effect was reversed by addition of exogenous ceramide (39). Similarly, a recent study demonstrated that the SARS-CoV-2 S protein tightly binds the free fatty acid, linoleic acid (LA). This binding stabilizes the S protein in a locked conformation and reduces its interaction with the ACE2 receptor. A similar fatty acid–binding pocket was also observed in SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome related coronavirus (MERS-CoV) (40). It has also been reported that omega-3 fatty acids, including LA and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), can interact with the receptor-binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein and inhibit attachment to the ACE2 receptor in vitro (41).

Lipids in viral replication

Upon entering the host cell, viruses reprogram cellular metabolism to remodel cellular membranes and fuel production of new virions (5, 42). Positive-sense RNA viruses assemble membrane-enclosed replication organelles (ROs), which localize the viral replicase and cofactors in close proximity and may shield the virus from immune recognition (1). The composition and source of lipids to form ROs varies among different families of viruses (2, 5). However, recruitment of phosphatidylinositol 4–kinase IIIβ appears to be a common strategy for remodeling cellular membranes, as this enzyme is important for the formation of ROs for human rhinovirus (HRV, RV-A16) (43), Aichi virus (44), Coxsackie B virus, and hepatitis C virus (45). In contrast, West Nile virus and dengue virus rely on fatty acid synthase to alter the lipid content at the replication membranes (46, 47).

Several studies have demonstrated that coronavirus ROs are derived from the endoplasmic reticulum (48, 49, 50, 51), and for SARS-CoV, the viral nonstructural proteins nsp3, nsp4, and nsp6 are involved in RO formation (52). Recent evidence suggests that cytosolic phospholipase A2α, which cleaves phospholipids at the sn-2 position to release LPLs and arachidonic acid (AA), is involved in coronavirus RO formation. Inhibition of cytosolic phospholipase A2α decreased LPL release, which decreased the formation of double membrane vesicles and impaired replication of HCoV-299E and MERS-CoV in vitro (53). Similarly, HCoV-299E infection in Huh-7 cells in vitro increased the levels of LPLs, specifically lysophosphatidylcholines and lysophosphatidylethanolamines, and fatty acids, including AA and LA, which the authors attributed to activation of cPLA2. Interestingly, addition of exogenous AA or LA decreased replication of both HCoV-299E and MERS-CoV, but it was not determined whether this was due to downstream lipid mediators generated from these fatty acids or activation of the Lands cycle that converts LPLs to phospholipids (54).

Several studies indicate that cholesterol homeostasis plays a critical role in coronavirus infection. MERS-CoV infection in vitro enhanced accumulation of lipid droplets and cholesterol and upregulated genes involved in lipid biosynthesis by activating SREBPs. Inhibition of SREBP DNA-binding activity with AM580 decreased viral replication in vitro. AM580 treatment in vivo decreased viral titers, improved survival, and decreased lung histopathology in mice infected with MERS-CoV or H7N9 IAV (55). Multiple genetic screens have also identified cholesterol biosynthesis as a key pathway in SARS-CoV-2 infection (56, 57, 58, 59, 60). SREBP-2, SREBP cleavage-activating protein, membrane-bound transcription factor site-1 protease, and membrane-bound transcription factor site-2 protease were consistently observed as critical host factors, and other genes linked to cholesterol metabolism and trafficking, including LDL receptor, NPC intracellular cholesterol transporter 1 (NPC1), NPC intracellular cholesterol transporter 2, and ER membrane protein complex subunit 1, were enriched in screens of SARS-CoV-2, HCoV-229E, and HCoV-OC43 infection (56, 59, 60). NPC1 has been shown to play a role in replication for multiple viruses, including Ebola virus, HIV, and Chikungunya virus; thus, NPC1 inhibition has been proposed as a potential antiviral strategy in COVID-19 (61). SARS-CoV-2 infection in monocytes increased lipid droplet formation and upregulated genes involved in lipid metabolism, including CD36, PPAR-γ, SREBP-1, and diacylglycerol acyltransferase-1. Inhibition of diacylglycerol acyltransferase-1 with A922500 dose-dependently reduced viral load in primary human monocytes and inhibited viral replication in Vero E6 cells. Viral particles colocalized with lipid droplets, predominantly associated with the phospholipid monolayer, suggesting that lipid droplets may serve as a replication platform for SARS-CoV-2 (62). Taken together, these results indicate that targeting SREBP signaling might be a viable therapeutic approach to utilize against multiple coronaviruses.

Genetic screens also highlight the importance of lysosomes and autophagy in the SARS-CoV-2 life cycle, potentially via their roles in lipid trafficking and metabolism. In addition to NPC1 and NPC intracellular cholesterol transporter 2, which have well-recognized roles in cholesterol transport in the lysosome, TMEM41B was identified as a critical host factor required for replication of multiple coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV-2 (59, 63). Although this protein has not been well characterized, it has been shown to regulate autophagy and lipid metabolism; TMEM41B-deficient cells exhibit impaired autophagosome formation, enlarged lipid droplets, and reduced β-oxidation of fatty acids (64, 65). In the case of SARS-CoV-2 infection, it has been hypothesized that TMEM41B facilitates ER membrane remodeling to form ROs (59, 63). Sigma-1 and sigma-2 receptors, both of which appear to play roles in cholesterol transport (66, 67), were identified as potential targets in SARS-CoV-2-human protein–protein interaction screens (68, 69). In screens of repurposed drugs, it has been observed that there was a strong correlation between antiviral efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 and the magnitude of phospholipidosis in vitro (70). However, none of the lead compounds tested exhibited significant antiviral activity in vivo, underscoring the need for additional research to translate these in vitro observations into a useful therapeutic approach in humans.

Lipids in regulating the immune response to viral infection

Eicosanoids are immunomodulatory and may also impact viral replication and the host antiviral response. These lipid mediators include prostaglandins (PGs) and thromboxane (Tx)–together, prostanoids–formed by the PG synthase enzymes, known as cyclooxygenases (COXs)-1 and COX-2; the leukotrienes, hydroperoxy and hydroxy fatty acids formed by the lipoxygenase (LOX) enzymes (5-LOX, 12-LOX, 15-LOX); and epoxyeicosatrienoic acids and 20-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid formed by cytochrome P450 enzymes. Targeting these pathways has been proposed as a strategy to dampen cytokine storm and treat complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection (71, 72, 73).

Genetic deletion or pharmacologic inhibition of COX-2 decreases pulmonary inflammation and improves mortality in mouse models of IAV infection (74, 75, 76, 77, 78). Interestingly, mortality was higher in COX-1−/− mice (74) and mice treated with the COX-1 selective inhibitor SC560 (75), relative to controls. However, the mechanism by which selective COX-1 inhibition may worsen outcomes in IAV infection was not investigated, and the relative effects of nonselective versus COX-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have not been delineated. COX-2 inhibition may enhance the early antiviral response after IAV infection in the setting of a chronic inflammatory state such as that induced by obesity (79). Although diet-induced obese mice had higher levels of cytokines and chemokines in lung homogenates at baseline, they displayed poor induction of type 1 interferon responses early in the course of infection and were subsequently unable to clear the virus. Acetaminophen treatment before IAV infection not only restored the early type 1 interferon induction in obese mice but also improved survival on day 14 after infection. Of note, no significant differences in survival due to acetaminophen were observed in lean mice after IAV infection (79).

Of the individual prostanoids, PGE2 and PGD2 have been most studied in the context of viral infection. Inhibition of PGE2 enhanced antiviral immunity and improved survival after IAV infection in mice. Compared with wild-type controls, mice lacking the microsomal PGE synthase-1 (Ptges−/−) had lower viral loads and greater infiltration of macrophages, monocytes, and dendritic cells (DCs) into their lungs and BALF 3 days after infection. After IAV infection in vitro, bone marrow–derived macrophages from Ptges−/− mice produced more interferon-β and had increased apoptosis than infected wild-type bone marrow–derived macrophages. This difference was abrogated by addition of exogenous PGE2, but not other prostanoids, and was mediated through its receptors, EPr2 and EPr4. Furthermore, Ptges−/− mice exhibited a more robust adaptive immune response, with higher levels of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in lymph nodes, BALF, and lung on days 9 and 11 after infection. Finally, pharmacologic inhibition of microsomal PGE synthase-1 or EPr2 and EPr4 signaling in vivo improved survival after IAV infection, and this benefit was lost in mice lacking the interferon-α/β receptor. These results indicate that PGE2 suppresses the innate and adaptive immune response to IAV infection in a type I interferon–dependent manner (80). A recent study reported a host-coronavirus protein interaction between PGE2 synthase 2 and nsp7 that was conserved among MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 (68), but whether this interaction impacts viral replication has yet to be elucidated.

Several studies suggest that PGD2 plays a role in the immune response to respiratory viral infections as well. DPr1 signaling delays migration of DCs to the lung and lymph nodes via downregulation of the chemokine CCR7 (81, 82). Interestingly, the impact of DPr1 signaling and delayed DC migration on adaptive immune responses appears to be age dependent. DPr1 inhibition enhanced DC migration and T-cell proliferation and increased survival in older mice (12 months of age), but not in young mice (6 weeks of age), after SARS-CoV and IAV infection (82). PGD2 also contributes to the pathogenesis of RSV bronchiolitis and susceptibility to asthma via DPr2 signaling (83). In a neonatal model of severe RSV bronchiolitis, treatment with a DPr2 inhibitor decreased viral load and improved morbidity via upregulation of IFN-λ. This effect was recapitulated by treatment with a DPr1 agonist, suggesting that these two receptors for PGD2 have opposing roles in the regulation of the antiviral response.

Prostacyclin (PGI2) can regulate the inflammatory response but has not been well studied in context of viral infection. We examined the role of PGI2 in RSV infection using mice lacking the IP receptor (IPr) or overexpressing prostacyclin synthase in alveolar and airway epithelial cells (84). Mice overexpressing prostacyclin synthase in alveolar and airway epithelial cells displayed less weight loss and lower viral titers after RSV infection than the littermate controls. In contrast, mice lacking the IPr lost more weight and had higher viral titers, suggesting that PGI2 may enhance the antiviral response and improve viral clearance.

While neither PGF nor TxA2 have been investigated with respect to modulation of viral clearance or host response to viral infection, they may yet contribute to the consequences of viral infection in the lung. For example, PGF accelerates the fibrotic reaction to bleomycin and might contribute to this consequence of viral infection (85). More directly, we have shown that antagonism of the thromboxane receptor prevents evolution of ARDS in a lipopolysaccharide model in sheep (86). In the case of COVID-19, suppression of TxA2 formation may have the added benefit of platelet inhibition (87), and multiple trials of low-dose aspirin at vatious stages in patients with COVID-19 are ongoing (Table 1).

Table 1.

Drugs targeting lipid pathways currently in clinical trials for COVID-19

Drug(s) Target Rationale for Use in COVID-19 ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier/Reference
Ibuprofen COX-1 and COX-2 COX-2 inhibition is anti-inflammatory and improves survival in preclinical models of viral infection.
Inhibition of PGE2 synthesis enhances the type I interferon response to viral infection.
NCT04334629, NCT04382768
Celecoxib COX-2 COX-2 inhibition is anti-inflammatory and improves survival in preclinical models of viral infection.
Inhibition of PGE2 synthesis enhances the type I interferon response to viral infection.
NCT04488081
Low-dose aspirin Platelet COX-1 Inhibition of TxA2 synthesis decreases platelet aggregation, which may prevent thrombotic complications of COVID-19. NCT04365309, NCT02735707, NCT04703608, NCT04483960, NCT04333407, NCT04324463, NCT04381936, NCT04498273, NCT04368377, NCT04363840, NCT04466670, NCT04808895, NCT04937088, NCT04768179, NCT04410328
Epoprostenol and iloprost IPr Prostacyclin analogs promote vasodilation in the pulmonary vasculature, which improve inflammation and oxygenation in COVID-19 patients with ARDS. NCT04705597, NCT04420741, NCT04445246
BGE-175 DPr1 Inhibition of DPr1 signaling enhances the adaptive immune response to viral infection in preclinical models. NCT04705597
Montelukast and Zafirlukast CysLT1R CysLT1R inhibition is anti-inflammatory and decreases airway hyper-responsiveness after pulmonary viral infection. NCT04871828, NCT04718285, NCT04695704, NCT04389411, NCT04714515
EPA, DHA, and icosapent ethyl N/A Omega-3 fatty acids have anti-inflammatory effects. NCT04505098, NCT04412018, NCT04460651, NCT04957940, NCT04658433, NCT04495816, NCT04647604, NCT04483271; Arnardottir et al. (88)
Statins HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibition of cholesterol synthesis may deplete cholesterol in lipid rafts.
Statins have pleiotropic anti-inflammatory effects and have been associated with improved outcomes in patients with viral pneumonia.
NCT04472611, NCT04904536, NCT04359095, NCT04801940, NCT04380402, NCT04466241, NCT04952350, NCT04900155, NCT02735707, NCT04333407
Fenofibrate PPAR-α PPAR-α agonism may reverse alterations in lipid metabolism induced by SARS-CoV-2 and block viral replication. NCT04517396, NCT04661930
Evolocumab PCSK9 PCSK9 loss-of-function genetic variants have been associated with a decrease in inflammatory cytokine response and improved survival in septic shock patients. NCT04941105
Opaganib SK2 SK inhibition suppresses viral replication and inhibits the hyperinflammatory response to viral infection. NCT04467840, NCT04414618
Ozanimod S1P1 and S1P5 Activation of S1P signaling restrained cytokine storm, reduced lung pathology, and improved survival in preclinical models of viral infection. NCT04405102

With regard to the LOX pathway, studies suggest that LTB4 is protective, whereas the cysteinyl leukotrienes (cysLTs), LTC4, LTD4, and LTE4, worsen outcomes after viral infection. LTB4 elicits antiviral activity in both in vitro and in vivo models of viral infections by promoting release of antimicrobial peptides (89, 90, 91) and stimulating interferon production via activation of the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain–containing protein 2 pathway (92). In mice infected with IAV, LTB4 administration 24 h after infection reduced viral load and lung injury (90). In addition to enhancing the antiviral response, there is also evidence that LTB4 promotes disease tolerance to IAV infection. LTB4 signaling through the BLTr1 stimulated the release of interferon-α, which decreased the proliferation of inflammatory macrophages and reduced IAV-induced lung pathology (93). In contrast, the LTD4 signaling through the CysLTr1 increased susceptibility of type 1 alveolar epithelial cells to IAV infection, and treatment with the CysLTr1 antagonist, zafirlukast, improved survival (94). CysLTr1 blockade decreased airway hyper-responsiveness in mice challenged with RSV (95) and attenuated airway hyper-responsiveness, infiltration of inflammatory cells, and excessive mucus production upon reinfection (96). A retrospective analysis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 reported that the risk of clinical deterioration, defined as any increase in the COVID-19 ordinal scale value from day 1 to day 3 of hospitalization, was significantly lower in patients treated with montelukast than in patients not receiving montelukast (97). Several prospective clinical trials are underway to explore the utility of CysLTr1 antagonists in treating COVID-19 (Table 1).

The epoxyeicosatrienoic acids possess potent anti-inflammatory properties by attenuating cytokine-induced NF-κB activation and leukocyte adhesion to the vascular wall (98), and inhibition of soluble epoxide hydrolase has been studied as a therapeutic strategy to decrease inflammation in vivo (99). Conversely, 20-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid activates NF-κB signaling and induces expression of cellular adhesion molecules and cytokines, thereby promoting inflammation (100). However, the role of these cytochrome P450–derived eicosanoids in regulating the host response to viral infection has not been studied to date (71).

The omega-3 fatty acids EPA and DHA have also been suggested as possible anti-inflammatory therapeutics for COVID-19. The anti-inflammatory effects of omega-3 fatty acids have been attributed by some to the formation of specialized proresolving mediators. However, this is controversial, and we find no evidence of their formation in biologically relevant quantities in humans (101). An observational study reported that a higher omega-3 index, EPA + DHA as a percentage of total erythrocyte fatty acids, was inversely associated with the risk of death in 100 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (102). Results of a pilot study of EPA + DHA supplementation (103) and a case report of icosapent ethyl treatment (104) in patients with COVID-19 also suggest benefit, and additional prospective clinical trials are ongoing (Table 1).

Lipidomics of COVID-19

Several studies have performed lipidomic profiling in patients with COVID-19. Although there is heterogeneity among these studies regarding the analytical methods used and the patient populations, some consistent findings have been reported, particularly with regard to serum cholesterol and lipoproteins. Serum triglycerides and VLDL are significantly higher, whereas HDL and LDL are significantly lower in patients with COVID-19 than in age- and sex-matched healthy controls (105, 106, 107, 108, 109). Interestingly, several observational studies have demonstrated that statins may improve outcomes in patients with COVID-19 (110, 111), providing support for future studies to evaluate treatment with these drugs prospectively and investigate the mechanisms underlying such a beneficial effect. Metabolomic and transcriptomic profiling also indicates a shift to fatty acid oxidation in patients with COVID-19 compared with healthy controls, which may indicate a metabolic switch to fuel viral replication (105, 112). However, similar alterations in serum lipoproteins and lipid metabolism have also been reported in patients with trauma (113), ARDS (114), and other infections (115), suggesting that the dysregulation of lipid metabolism observed in patients with COVID-19 reflects a common metabolic shift in response to critical illness, rather than a unique signature of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Most studies report that the levels of HDL and LDL return to baseline after recovery. However, some studies suggest that alterations in lipid metabolism persist even after recovery from COVID-19 (116, 117), and it has been reported that lipid metabolism is dysregulated in survivors of SARS 12 years after infection, compared with age-matched healthy volunteers (118). Thus, longitudinal studies in patients who recover from COVID-19 will be instrumental in determining how long these alterations in lipid metabolism persist or if they are associated with long-term sequelae of infection.

Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), a metabolite of sphingosine that can act intracellularly or via one of five G-protein–coupled receptors (S1P1 to S1P5), is decreased in patients with COVID-19 compared with healthy controls (119, 120). HDL is the major carrier for S1P in the plasma; thus, this decrease may be a consequence of the decrease in HDL levels in patients with COVID-19, as has been previously reported in patients with sepsis (121). S1P signaling can modulate numerous biological processes, including cell proliferation, apoptosis, and inflammation. In mouse models of IAV infection, activation of the S1P1 receptor in the lung endothelium restrained cytokine storm, reduced lung pathology, and improved survival (122, 123, 124, 125), while genetic deletion of S1P1 in endothelial cells decreased survival and worsened lung pathology (125).

In addition of the immunomodulatory effects of S1P signaling, inhibition of the sphingosine kinases (SK1 and SK2) that phosphorylate sphingosine to S1P may have antiviral activity. In the context of IAV infection, SK1 and SK2 promote viral replication by modulating NF-κB activation (126, 127, 128). Conversely, overexpression of S1P lyase, which irreversibly cleaves S1P to phosphoethanolamine and hexadecanal, inhibited viral protein synthesis, and decreased IAV viral titers in vitro (126, 129). SK inhibition suppresses viral protein and RNA synthesis by decreasing IKKαβ phosphorylation and NF-κB activation. SK inhibition also decreases activation of the ERK MAPK and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways, leading to decreased phosphorylation of RanBP3 and decreased nuclear export of viral RNP complexes (127). Moreover, treatment with SK2 inhibitor (opaganib) in mice in vivo decreased viral titers, blunted weight loss, and decreased mortality after IAV infection (treated: 50% vs. control: 90%). Similar improvements in survival were also observed with SK1 inhibitor treatment (128). Of note, studies of opaganib in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia are ongoing (Table 1).

Patients with COVID-19 also exhibited lower levels of glycerophospholipids (107, 119, 120) and higher levels of the corresponding LPLs (107, 120), indicating increased phospholipase A2 activation. Moreover, expression of enzymes involved in eicosanoid synthesis (PLA2G4A, PTGS2, PTGES3, ALOX5, and ALOX5AP) was upregulated in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with COVID-19 (130). Consistent with these observations, higher levels of AA and oleic acid (107) and alterations in eicosanoid profiles (131) have also been reported in patients with COVID-19. A recent report suggests that levels of a secretory PLA2 may be a biomarker predictive of severe COVID-19 (132). Further investigation is warranted to determine whether drugs that modulate eicosanoid lipid mediators might have antiviral activity in COVID-19.

Conclusions

The integral role of lipids in the viral life cycle suggests that targeting these pathways may be a viable therapeutic strategy. However, development of such novel antiviral agents for COVID-19 will require a better understanding of the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on lipid metabolism in vitro and in model organisms. Furthermore, serial lipidomic analyses in individuals with COVID-19 may identify specific lipid pathways that mediate the heterogenous response to viral infection, serve as prognostic biomarkers, or contribute to long-term sequelae.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

Acknowledgments

Author contributions

K. N. T., S. Y. T., and S. S. writing – original draft; K. N. T., S. Y. T., S. S., and G. A. F. writing – review and editing.

Funding and additional information

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (Grant number K08HL132053 to S. S.) and U54TR001878. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

References

  • 1.Heaton N.S., Randall G. Multifaceted roles for lipids in viral infection. Trends Microbiol. 2011;19:368–375. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2011.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ketter E., Randall G. Virus impact on lipids and membranes. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2019;6:319–340. doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-092818-015748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bezgovsek J., Gulbins E., Friedrich S.K., Lang K.S., Duhan V. Sphingolipids in early viral replication and innate immune activation. Biol. Chem. 2018;399:1115–1123. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2018-0181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schoggins J.W., Randall G. Lipids in innate antiviral defense. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;14:379–385. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhang Z., He G., Filipowicz N.A., Randall G., Belov G.A., Kopek B.G., Wang X. Host lipids in positive-strand RNA virus genome replication. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:286. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cossart P., Helenius A. Endocytosis of viruses and bacteria. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2014;6 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Moller-Tank S., Maury W. Phosphatidylserine receptors: enhancers of enveloped virus entry and infection. Virology. 2014;468-470:565–580. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2014.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lanzrein M., Schlegel A., Kempf C. Entry and uncoating of enveloped viruses. Biochem. J. 1994;302:313–320. doi: 10.1042/bj3020313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hoffmann M., Kleine-Weber H., Schroeder S., Kruger N., Herrler T., Erichsen S., Schiergens T.S., Herrler G., Wu N.H., Nitsche A., Muller M.A., Drosten C., Pohlmann S. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell. 2020;181:271–280.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shang J., Wan Y., Luo C., Ye G., Geng Q., Auerbach A., Li F. Cell entry mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2020;117:11727–11734. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2003138117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.McBride C.E., Machamer C.E. Palmitoylation of SARS-CoV S protein is necessary for partitioning into detergent-resistant membranes and cell-cell fusion but not interaction with M protein. Virology. 2010;405:139–148. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2010.05.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Petit C.M., Chouljenko V.N., Iyer A., Colgrove R., Farzan M., Knipe D.M., Kousoulas K.G. Palmitoylation of the cysteine-rich endodomain of the SARS-coronavirus spike glycoprotein is important for spike-mediated cell fusion. Virology. 2007;360:264–274. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.10.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mesquita F.S., Abrami L., Sergeeva O., Turelli P., Kunz B., Raclot C., Montoya J.P., Abriata L.A., Peraro M.D., Trono D., D'Angelo G., van der Goot F.G. S-acylation controls SARS-Cov-2 membrane lipid organization and enhances infectivity. bioRxiv. 2021 doi: 10.1101/2021.03.14.435299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gadalla M.R., Veit M. Toward the identification of ZDHHC enzymes required for palmitoylation of viral protein as potential drug targets. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2020;15:159–177. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2020.1696306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Agnello V., Abel G., Elfahal M., Knight G.B., Zhang Q.X. Hepatitis C virus and other flaviviridae viruses enter cells via low density lipoprotein receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999;96:12766–12771. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.22.12766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dreux M., Dao Thi V.L., Fresquet J., Guerin M., Julia Z., Verney G., Durantel D., Zoulim F., Lavillette D., Cosset F.L., Bartosch B. Receptor complementation and mutagenesis reveal SR-BI as an essential HCV entry factor and functionally imply its intra- and extra-cellular domains. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wei C., Wan L., Yan Q., Wang X., Zhang J., Yang X., Zhang Y., Fan C., Li D., Deng Y., Sun J., Gong J., Yang X., Wang Y., Wang X. HDL-scavenger receptor B type 1 facilitates SARS-CoV-2 entry. Nat. Metab. 2020;2:1391–1400. doi: 10.1038/s42255-020-00324-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ramirez S., Fernandez-Antunez C., Galli A., Underwood A., Pham L.V., Ryberg L.A., Feng S., Pedersen M.S., Mikkelsen L.S., Belouzard S., Dubuisson J., Solund C., Weis N., Gottwein J.M., Fahnoe U. Overcoming culture restriction for SARS-CoV-2 in human cells facilitates the screening of compounds inhibiting viral replication. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2021;65 doi: 10.1128/AAC.00097-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Teissier E., Pecheur E.I. Lipids as modulators of membrane fusion mediated by viral fusion proteins. Eur. Biophys. J. 2007;36:887–899. doi: 10.1007/s00249-007-0201-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vigant F., Lee J., Hollmann A., Tanner L.B., Akyol Ataman Z., Yun T., Shui G., Aguilar H.C., Zhang D., Meriwether D., Roman-Sosa G., Robinson L.R., Juelich T.L., Buczkowski H., Chou S. A mechanistic paradigm for broad-spectrum antivirals that target virus-cell fusion. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wolf M.C., Freiberg A.N., Zhang T., Akyol-Ataman Z., Grock A., Hong P.W., Li J., Watson N.F., Fang A.Q., Aguilar H.C., Porotto M., Honko A.N., Damoiseaux R., Miller J.P., Woodson S.E. A broad-spectrum antiviral targeting entry of enveloped viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010;107:3157–3162. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909587107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.St Vincent M.R., Colpitts C.C., Ustinov A.V., Muqadas M., Joyce M.A., Barsby N.L., Epand R.F., Epand R.M., Khramyshev S.A., Valueva O.A., Korshun V.A., Tyrrell D.L., Schang L.M. Rigid amphipathic fusion inhibitors, small molecule antiviral compounds against enveloped viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010;107:17339–17344. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010026107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Xia S., Liu M., Wang C., Xu W., Lan Q., Feng S., Qi F., Bao L., Du L., Liu S., Qin C., Sun F., Shi Z., Zhu Y., Jiang S. Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 (previously 2019-nCoV) infection by a highly potent pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting its spike protein that harbors a high capacity to mediate membrane fusion. Cell Res. 2020;30:343–355. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0305-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bukrinsky M.I., Mukhamedova N., Sviridov D. Lipid rafts and pathogens: the art of deception and exploitation. J. Lipid Res. 2020;61:601–610. doi: 10.1194/jlr.TR119000391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Choi K.S., Aizaki H., Lai M.M. Murine coronavirus requires lipid rafts for virus entry and cell-cell fusion but not for virus release. J. Virol. 2005;79:9862–9871. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.15.9862-9871.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Thorp E.B., Gallagher T.M. Requirements for CEACAMs and cholesterol during murine coronavirus cell entry. J. Virol. 2004;78:2682–2692. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.6.2682-2692.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Guo H., Huang M., Yuan Q., Wei Y., Gao Y., Mao L., Gu L., Tan Y.W., Zhong Y., Liu D., Sun S. The important role of lipid raft-mediated attachment in the infection of cultured cells by coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus Beaudette strain. PLoS One. 2017;12 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li G.M., Li Y.G., Yamate M., Li S.M., Ikuta K. Lipid rafts play an important role in the early stage of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus life cycle. Microbes Infect. 2007;9:96–102. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2006.10.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang H., Yang P., Liu K., Guo F., Zhang Y., Zhang G., Jiang C. SARS coronavirus entry into host cells through a novel clathrin- and caveolae-independent endocytic pathway. Cell Res. 2008;18:290–301. doi: 10.1038/cr.2008.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lu Y., Liu D.X., Tam J.P. Lipid rafts are involved in SARS-CoV entry into Vero E6 cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008;369:344–349. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.02.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Puri A., Rawat S.S., Lin H.M., Finnegan C.M., Mikovits J., Ruscetti F.W., Blumenthal R. An inhibitor of glycosphingolipid metabolism blocks HIV-1 infection of primary T-cells. AIDS. 2004;18:849–858. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200404090-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Magerus-Chatinet A., Yu H., Garcia S., Ducloux E., Terris B., Bomsel M. Galactosyl ceramide expressed on dendritic cells can mediate HIV-1 transfer from monocyte derived dendritic cells to autologous T cells. Virology. 2007;362:67–74. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.11.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wiley D.C., Skehel J.J. The structure and function of the hemagglutinin membrane glycoprotein of influenza virus. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1987;56:365–394. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.56.070187.002053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Matsubara T., Sumi M., Kubota H., Taki T., Okahata Y., Sato T. Inhibition of influenza virus infections by sialylgalactose-binding peptides selected from a phage library. J. Med. Chem. 2009;52:4247–4256. doi: 10.1021/jm801570y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Grassme H., Riethmuller J., Gulbins E. Biological aspects of ceramide-enriched membrane domains. Prog. Lipid Res. 2007;46:161–170. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2007.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhang Y., Li X., Becker K.A., Gulbins E. Ceramide-enriched membrane domains--structure and function. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2009;1788:178–183. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.07.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dreschers S., Franz P., Dumitru C., Wilker B., Jahnke K., Gulbins E. Infections with human rhinovirus induce the formation of distinct functional membrane domains. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2007;20:241–254. doi: 10.1159/000104170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Grassme H., Riehle A., Wilker B., Gulbins E. Rhinoviruses infect human epithelial cells via ceramide-enriched membrane platforms. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:26256–26262. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500835200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Orchard R.C., Wilen C.B., Virgin H.W. Sphingolipid biosynthesis induces a conformational change in the murine norovirus receptor and facilitates viral infection. Nat. Microbiol. 2018;3:1109–1114. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0221-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Toelzer C., Gupta K., Yadav S.K.N., Borucu U., Davidson A.D., Kavanagh Williamson M., Shoemark D.K., Garzoni F., Staufer O., Milligan R., Capin J., Mulholland A.J., Spatz J., Fitzgerald D., Berger I. Free fatty acid binding pocket in the locked structure of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Science. 2020;370:725–730. doi: 10.1126/science.abd3255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Goc A., Niedzwiecki A., Rath M. Polyunsaturated omega-3 fatty acids inhibit ACE2-controlled SARS-CoV-2 binding and cellular entry. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:5207. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84850-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Raniga K., Liang C. Interferons: reprogramming the metabolic network against viral infection. Viruses. 2018;10:36. doi: 10.3390/v10010036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Roulin P.S., Murer L.P., Greber U.F. A single point mutation in the rhinovirus 2B protein reduces the requirement for phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase class III beta in viral replication. J. Virol. 2018;92 doi: 10.1128/JVI.01462-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ishikawa-Sasaki K., Nagashima S., Taniguchi K., Sasaki J. Model of OSBP-mediated cholesterol supply to aichi virus RNA replication sites involving protein-protein interactions among viral proteins, ACBD3, OSBP, VAP-A/B, and SAC1. J. Virol. 2018;92 doi: 10.1128/JVI.01952-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hsu N.Y., Ilnytska O., Belov G., Santiana M., Chen Y.H., Takvorian P.M., Pau C., van der Schaar H., Kaushik-Basu N., Balla T., Cameron C.E., Ehrenfeld E., van Kuppeveld F.J., Altan-Bonnet N. Viral reorganization of the secretory pathway generates distinct organelles for RNA replication. Cell. 2010;141:799–811. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Heaton N.S., Perera R., Berger K.L., Khadka S., Lacount D.J., Kuhn R.J., Randall G. Dengue virus nonstructural protein 3 redistributes fatty acid synthase to sites of viral replication and increases cellular fatty acid synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010;107:17345–17350. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010811107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Martin-Acebes M.A., Blazquez A.B., Jimenez de Oya N., Escribano-Romero E., Saiz J.C. West Nile virus replication requires fatty acid synthesis but is independent on phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate lipids. PLoS One. 2011;6 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.van Hemert M.J., van den Worm S.H., Knoops K., Mommaas A.M., Gorbalenya A.E., Snijder E.J. SARS-coronavirus replication/transcription complexes are membrane-protected and need a host factor for activity in vitro. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Knoops K., Kikkert M., Worm S.H., Zevenhoven-Dobbe J.C., van der Meer Y., Koster A.J., Mommaas A.M., Snijder E.J. SARS-coronavirus replication is supported by a reticulovesicular network of modified endoplasmic reticulum. PLoS Biol. 2008;6 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Snijder E.J., Limpens R., de Wilde A.H., de Jong A.W.M., Zevenhoven-Dobbe J.C., Maier H.J., Faas F., Koster A.J., Barcena M. A unifying structural and functional model of the coronavirus replication organelle: tracking down RNA synthesis. PLoS Biol. 2020;18 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Maier H.J., Hawes P.C., Cottam E.M., Mantell J., Verkade P., Monaghan P., Wileman T., Britton P. Infectious bronchitis virus generates spherules from zippered endoplasmic reticulum membranes. mBio. 2013;4 doi: 10.1128/mBio.00801-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Angelini M.M., Akhlaghpour M., Neuman B.W., Buchmeier M.J. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nonstructural proteins 3, 4, and 6 induce double-membrane vesicles. mBio. 2013;4 doi: 10.1128/mBio.00524-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Muller C., Hardt M., Schwudke D., Neuman B.W., Pleschka S., Ziebuhr J. Inhibition of cytosolic phospholipase A2alpha impairs an early step of coronavirus replication in cell culture. J. Virol. 2018;92 doi: 10.1128/JVI.01463-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yan B., Chu H., Yang D., Sze K.H., Lai P.M., Yuan S., Shuai H., Wang Y., Kao R.Y., Chan J.F., Yuen K.Y. Characterization of the lipidomic profile of human coronavirus-infected cells: implications for lipid metabolism remodeling upon coronavirus replication. Viruses. 2019;11:73. doi: 10.3390/v11010073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Yuan S., Chu H., Chan J.F., Ye Z.W., Wen L., Yan B., Lai P.M., Tee K.M., Huang J., Chen D., Li C., Zhao X., Yang D., Chiu M.C., Yip C. SREBP-dependent lipidomic reprogramming as a broad-spectrum antiviral target. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:120. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08015-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wang R., Simoneau C.R., Kulsuptrakul J., Bouhaddou M., Travisano K.A., Hayashi J.M., Carlson-Stevermer J., Zengel J.R., Richards C.M., Fozouni P., Oki J., Rodriguez L., Joehnk B., Walcott K., Holden K. Genetic screens identify host factors for SARS-CoV-2 and common cold coronaviruses. Cell. 2021;184:106–119.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Daniloski Z., Jordan T.X., Wessels H.H., Hoagland D.A., Kasela S., Legut M., Maniatis S., Mimitou E.P., Lu L., Geller E., Danziger O., Rosenberg B.R., Phatnani H., Smibert P., Lappalainen T. Identification of required host factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection in human cells. Cell. 2021;184:92–105.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Baggen J., Persoons L., Vanstreels E., Jansen S., Van Looveren D., Boeckx B., Geudens V., De Man J., Jochmans D., Wauters J., Wauters E., Vanaudenaerde B.M., Lambrechts D., Neyts J., Dallmeier K. Genome-wide CRISPR screening identifies TMEM106B as a proviral host factor for SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Genet. 2021;53:435–444. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00805-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Schneider W.M., Luna J.M., Hoffmann H.H., Sanchez-Rivera F.J., Leal A.A., Ashbrook A.W., Le Pen J., Ricardo-Lax I., Michailidis E., Peace A., Stenzel A.F., Lowe S.W., MacDonald M.R., Rice C.M., Poirier J.T. Genome-scale identification of SARS-CoV-2 and pan-coronavirus host factor networks. Cell. 2021;184:120–132.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hoffmann H.H., Sanchez-Rivera F.J., Schneider W.M., Luna J.M., Soto-Feliciano Y.M., Ashbrook A.W., Le Pen J., Leal A.A., Ricardo-Lax I., Michailidis E., Hao Y., Stenzel A.F., Peace A., Zuber J., Allis C.D. Functional interrogation of a SARS-CoV-2 host protein interactome identifies unique and shared coronavirus host factors. Cell Host Microbe. 2021;29:267–280.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.12.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sturley S.L., Rajakumar T., Hammond N., Higaki K., Marka Z., Marka S., Munkacsi A.B. Potential COVID-19 therapeutics from a rare disease: weaponizing lipid dysregulation to combat viral infectivity. J. Lipid Res. 2020;61:972–982. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R120000851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Dias S., Soares V.C., Ferreira A.C., Sacramento C.Q., Fintelman-Rodrigues N., Temerozo J.R., Teixeira L., Nunes da Silva M.A., Barreto E., Mattos M., de Freitas C.S., Azevedo-Quintanilha I.G., Manso P.P.A., Miranda M.D., Siqueira M.M. Lipid droplets fuel SARS-CoV-2 replication and production of inflammatory mediators. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Trimarco J.D., Heaton B.E., Chaparian R.R., Burke K.N., Binder R.A., Gray G.C., Smith C.M., Menachery V.D., Heaton N.S. TMEM41B is a host factor required for the replication of diverse coronaviruses including SARS-CoV-2. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Moretti F., Bergman P., Dodgson S., Marcellin D., Claerr I., Goodwin J.M., DeJesus R., Kang Z., Antczak C., Begue D., Bonenfant D., Graff A., Genoud C., Reece-Hoyes J.S., Russ C. TMEM41B is a novel regulator of autophagy and lipid mobilization. EMBO Rep. 2018;19 doi: 10.15252/embr.201845889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Morita K., Hama Y., Izume T., Tamura N., Ueno T., Yamashita Y., Sakamaki Y., Mimura K., Morishita H., Shihoya W., Nureki O., Mano H., Mizushima N. Genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies TMEM41B as a gene required for autophagosome formation. J. Cell Biol. 2018;217:3817–3828. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201804132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zhemkov V., Ditlev J.A., Lee W.R., Wilson M., Liou J., Rosen M.K., Bezprozvanny I. The role of sigma 1 receptor in organization of endoplasmic reticulum signaling microdomains. Elife. 2021;10 doi: 10.7554/eLife.65192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bartz F., Kern L., Erz D., Zhu M., Gilbert D., Meinhof T., Wirkner U., Erfle H., Muckenthaler M., Pepperkok R., Runz H. Identification of cholesterol-regulating genes by targeted RNAi screening. Cell Metab. 2009;10:63–75. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gordon D.E., Hiatt J., Bouhaddou M., Rezelj V.V., Ulferts S., Braberg H., Jureka A.S., Obernier K., Guo J.Z., Batra J., Kaake R.M., Weckstein A.R., Owens T.W., Gupta M., Pourmal S. Comparative host-coronavirus protein interaction networks reveal pan-viral disease mechanisms. Science. 2020;370 doi: 10.1126/science.abe9403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gordon D.E., Jang G.M., Bouhaddou M., Xu J., Obernier K., White K.M., O'Meara M.J., Rezelj V.V., Guo J.Z., Swaney D.L., Tummino T.A., Huttenhain R., Kaake R.M., Richards A.L., Tutuncuoglu B. A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing. Nature. 2020;583:459–468. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2286-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Tummino T.A., Rezelj V.V., Fischer B., Fischer A., O'Meara M.J., Monel B., Vallet T., Zhang Z., Alon A., O'Donnell H.R., Lyu J., Schadt H., White K.M., Krogan N.J., Urban L. Phospholipidosis is a shared mechanism underlying the in vitro antiviral activity of many repurposed drugs against SARS-CoV-2. bioRxiv. 2021 doi: 10.1101/2021.03.23.436648. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Hammock B.D., Wang W., Gilligan M.M., Panigrahy D. Eicosanoids: the overlooked storm in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? Am. J. Pathol. 2020;190:1782–1788. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2020.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Funk C.D., Ardakani A. A novel strategy to mitigate the hyperinflammatory response to COVID-19 by targeting leukotrienes. Front. Pharmacol. 2020;11:1214. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Hoxha M. What about COVID-19 and arachidonic acid pathway? Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2020;76:1501–1504. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-02941-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Carey M.A., Bradbury J.A., Seubert J.M., Langenbach R., Zeldin D.C., Germolec D.R. Contrasting effects of cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and COX-2 deficiency on the host response to influenza A viral infection. J. Immunol. 2005;175:6878–6884. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.10.6878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Carey M.A., Bradbury J.A., Rebolloso Y.D., Graves J.P., Zeldin D.C., Germolec D.R. Pharmacologic inhibition of COX-1 and COX-2 in influenza A viral infection in mice. PLoS One. 2010;5 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Lauder S.N., Taylor P.R., Clark S.R., Evans R.L., Hindley J.P., Smart K., Leach H., Kidd E.J., Broadley K.J., Jones S.A., Wise M.P., Godkin A.J., O'Donnell V., Gallimore A.M. Paracetamol reduces influenza-induced immunopathology in a mouse model of infection without compromising virus clearance or the generation of protective immunity. Thorax. 2011;66:368–374. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.150318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Li C., Li C., Zhang A.J., To K.K., Lee A.C., Zhu H., Wu H.W., Chan J.F., Chen H., Hung I.F., Li L., Yuen K.Y. Avian influenza A H7N9 virus induces severe pneumonia in mice without prior adaptation and responds to a combination of zanamivir and COX-2 inhibitor. PLoS One. 2014;9 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Zheng B.J., Chan K.W., Lin Y.P., Zhao G.Y., Chan C., Zhang H.J., Chen H.L., Wong S.S., Lau S.K., Woo P.C., Chan K.H., Jin D.Y., Yuen K.Y. Delayed antiviral plus immunomodulator treatment still reduces mortality in mice infected by high inoculum of influenza A/H5N1 virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008;105:8091–8096. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711942105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Zhang A.J.X., Zhu H., Chen Y., Li C., Li C., Chu H., Gozali L., Lee A.C.Y., To K.K.W., Hung I.F.N., Yuen K.Y. Prostaglandin E2-mediated impairment of innate immune response to A(H1N1)pdm09 infection in diet-induced obese mice could be restored by paracetamol. J. Infect. Dis. 2019;219:795–807. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Coulombe F., Jaworska J., Verway M., Tzelepis F., Massoud A., Gillard J., Wong G., Kobinger G., Xing Z., Couture C., Joubert P., Fritz J.H., Powell W.S., Divangahi M. Targeted prostaglandin E2 inhibition enhances antiviral immunity through induction of type I interferon and apoptosis in macrophages. Immunity. 2014;40:554–568. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Tumala B., Phelps K.R., Zhang S., Bhattacharya S., Shornick L.P. Prostaglandin D2 levels regulate CD103(+) conventional dendritic cell activation in neonates during respiratory viral infection. Viral Immunol. 2018;31:658–667. doi: 10.1089/vim.2018.0090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Zhao J., Zhao J., Legge K., Perlman S. Age-related increases in PGD(2) expression impair respiratory DC migration, resulting in diminished T cell responses upon respiratory virus infection in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2011;121:4921–4930. doi: 10.1172/JCI59777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Werder R.B., Lynch J.P., Simpson J.C., Zhang V., Hodge N.H., Poh M., Forbes-Blom E., Kulis C., Smythe M.L., Upham J.W., Spann K., Everard M.L., Phipps S. PGD2/DP2 receptor activation promotes severe viral bronchiolitis by suppressing IFN-lambda production. Sci. Transl. Med. 2018;10 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aao0052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Hashimoto K., Graham B.S., Geraci M.W., FitzGerald G.A., Egan K., Zhou W., Goleniewska K., O'Neal J.F., Morrow J.D., Durbin R.K., Wright P.F., Collins R.D., Suzutani T., Peebles R.S., Jr. Signaling through the prostaglandin I2 receptor IP protects against respiratory syncytial virus-induced illness. J. Virol. 2004;78:10303–10309. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.19.10303-10309.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Oga T., Matsuoka T., Yao C., Nonomura K., Kitaoka S., Sakata D., Kita Y., Tanizawa K., Taguchi Y., Chin K., Mishima M., Shimizu T., Narumiya S. Prostaglandin F(2alpha) receptor signaling facilitates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis independently of transforming growth factor-beta. Nat. Med. 2009;15:1426–1430. doi: 10.1038/nm.2066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Kuhl P.G., Bolds J.M., Loyd J.E., Snapper J.R., FitzGerald G.A. Thromboxane receptor-mediated bronchial and hemodynamic responses in ovine endotoxemia. Am. J. Physiol. 1988;254:R310–R319. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1988.254.2.R310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Panka B.A., de Grooth H.J., Spoelstra-de Man A.M., Looney M.R., Tuinman P.R. Prevention or treatment of ards with aspirin: a review of preclinical models and meta-analysis of clinical studies. Shock. 2017;47:13–21. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Arnardottir H., Pawelzik S.C., Ohlund Wistbacka U., Artiach G., Hofmann R., Reinholdsson I., Braunschweig F., Tornvall P., Religa D., Back M. Stimulating the resolution of inflammation through omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in COVID-19: rationale for the COVID-omega-F trial. Front. Physiol. 2020;11:624657. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.624657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Flamand L., Tremblay M.J., Borgeat P. Leukotriene B4 triggers the in vitro and in vivo release of potent antimicrobial agents. J. Immunol. 2007;178:8036–8045. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.12.8036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Gaudreault E., Gosselin J. Leukotriene B4 induces release of antimicrobial peptides in lungs of virally infected mice. J. Immunol. 2008;180:6211–6221. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.9.6211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Widegren H., Andersson M., Borgeat P., Flamand L., Johnston S., Greiff L. LTB4 increases nasal neutrophil activity and conditions neutrophils to exert antiviral effects. Respir. Med. 2011;105:997–1006. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.12.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Le Bel M., Gosselin J. Leukotriene B4 enhances NOD2-dependent innate response against influenza virus infection. PLoS One. 2015;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Pernet E., Downey J., Vinh D.C., Powell W.S., Divangahi M. Leukotriene B4-type I interferon axis regulates macrophage-mediated disease tolerance to influenza infection. Nat. Microbiol. 2019;4:1389–1400. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0444-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Cardani A., Boulton A., Kim T.S., Braciale T.J. Alveolar macrophages prevent lethal influenza pneumonia by inhibiting infection of type-1 alveolar epithelial cells. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Fullmer J.J., Khan A.M., Elidemir O., Chiappetta C., Stark J.M., Colasurdo G.N. Role of cysteinyl leukotrienes in airway inflammation and responsiveness following RSV infection in BALB/c mice. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2005;16:593–601. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2005.00248.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Han J., Jia Y., Takeda K., Shiraishi Y., Okamoto M., Dakhama A., Gelfand E.W. Montelukast during primary infection prevents airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation after reinfection with respiratory syncytial virus. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2010;182:455–463. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200912-1811OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Khan A.R., Misdary C., Yegya-Raman N., Kim S., Narayanan N., Siddiqui S., Salgame P., Radbel J., Groote F., Michel C., Mehnert J., Hernandez C., Braciale T., Malhotra J., Gentile M.A. Montelukast in hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19. J. Asthma. 2021 doi: 10.1080/02770903.2021.1881967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Node K., Huo Y., Ruan X., Yang B., Spiecker M., Ley K., Zeldin D.C., Liao J.K. Anti-inflammatory properties of cytochrome P450 epoxygenase-derived eicosanoids. Science. 1999;285:1276–1279. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5431.1276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Schmelzer K.R., Kubala L., Newman J.W., Kim I.H., Eiserich J.P., Hammock B.D. Soluble epoxide hydrolase is a therapeutic target for acute inflammation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005;102:9772–9777. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503279102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Ishizuka T., Cheng J., Singh H., Vitto M.D., Manthati V.L., Falck J.R., Laniado-Schwartzman M. 20-Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid stimulates nuclear factor-kappaB activation and the production of inflammatory cytokines in human endothelial cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2008;324:103–110. doi: 10.1124/jpet.107.130336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Skarke C., Alamuddin N., Lawson J.A., Li X., Ferguson J.F., Reilly M.P., FitzGerald G.A. Bioactive products formed in humans from fish oils. J. Lipid Res. 2015;56:1808–1820. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M060392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Asher A., Tintle N.L., Myers M., Lockshon L., Bacareza H., Harris W.S. Blood omega-3 fatty acids and death from COVID-19: a pilot study. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids. 2021;166:102250. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2021.102250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Doaei S., Gholami S., Rastgoo S., Gholamalizadeh M., Bourbour F., Bagheri S.E., Samipoor F., Akbari M.E., Shadnoush M., Ghorat F., Mosavi Jarrahi S.A., Ashouri Mirsadeghi N., Hajipour A., Joola P., Moslem A. The effect of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on clinical and biochemical parameters of critically ill patients with COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial. J. Transl. Med. 2021;19:128. doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-02795-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Berger A.A., Sherburne R., Urits I., Patel H., Eskander J. Icosapent ethyl - a successful treatment for symptomatic COVID-19 infection. Cureus. 2020;12 doi: 10.7759/cureus.10211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Bruzzone C., Bizkarguenaga M., Gil-Redondo R., Diercks T., Arana E., Garcia de Vicuna A., Seco M., Bosch A., Palazon A., San Juan I., Lain A., Gil-Martinez J., Bernardo-Seisdedos G., Fernandez-Ramos D., Lopitz-Otsoa F. SARS-CoV-2 infection dysregulates the metabolomic and lipidomic profiles of serum. iScience. 2020;23:101645. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Meoni G., Ghini V., Maggi L., Vignoli A., Mazzoni A., Salvati L., Capone M., Vanni A., Tenori L., Fontanari P., Lavorini F., Peris A., Bartoloni A., Liotta F., Cosmi L. Metabolomic/lipidomic profiling of COVID-19 and individual response to tocilizumab. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Barberis E., Timo S., Amede E., Vanella V.V., Puricelli C., Cappellano G., Raineri D., Cittone M.G., Rizzi E., Pedrinelli A.R., Vassia V., Casciaro F.G., Priora S., Nerici I., Galbiati A. Large-scale plasma analysis revealed new mechanisms and molecules associated with the host response to SARS-CoV-2. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:8623. doi: 10.3390/ijms21228623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Sun J.T., Chen Z., Nie P., Ge H., Shen L., Yang F., Qu X.L., Ying X.Y., Zhou Y., Wang W., Zhang M., Pu J. Lipid profile features and their associations with disease severity and mortality in patients with COVID-19. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2020;7:584987. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.584987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Kimhofer T., Lodge S., Whiley L., Gray N., Loo R.L., Lawler N.G., Nitschke P., Bong S.H., Morrison D.L., Begum S., Richards T., Yeap B.B., Smith C., Smith K.G.C., Holmes E. Integrative modeling of quantitative plasma lipoprotein, metabolic, and amino acid data reveals a multiorgan pathological signature of SARS-CoV-2 infection. J. Proteome Res. 2020;19:4442–4454. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Lee H.Y., Ahn J., Park J., Kyung Kang C., Won S.H., Wook Kim D., Park J.H., Chung K.H., Joh J.S., Bang J.H., Hee Kang C., Bum Pyun W., Oh M.D., Korean Society of Hypertension, National Committee for Clinical Management of Emerging Infectious Diseases Beneficial effect of statins in COVID-19-related outcomes-brief report: a national population-based cohort study. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2021;41:e175–e182. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.120.315551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Zhang X.J., Qin J.J., Cheng X., Shen L., Zhao Y.C., Yuan Y., Lei F., Chen M.M., Yang H., Bai L., Song X., Lin L., Xia M., Zhou F., Zhou J. In-hospital use of statins is associated with a reduced risk of mortality among individuals with COVID-19. Cell Metab. 2020;32:176–187.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.06.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Nie X., Qian L., Sun R., Huang B., Dong X., Xiao Q., Zhang Q., Lu T., Yue L., Chen S., Li X., Sun Y., Li L., Xu L., Li Y. Multi-organ proteomic landscape of COVID-19 autopsies. Cell. 2021;184:775–791.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Peltz E.D., D'Alessandro A., Moore E.E., Chin T., Silliman C.C., Sauaia A., Hansen K.C., Banerjee A. Pathologic metabolism: an exploratory study of the plasma metabolome of critical injury. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78:742–751. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Maile M.D., Standiford T.J., Engoren M.C., Stringer K.A., Jewell E.S., Rajendiran T.M., Soni T., Burant C.F. Associations of the plasma lipidome with mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome: a longitudinal cohort study. Respir. Res. 2018;19:60. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0758-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Feingold K.R. The bidirectional link between HDL and COVID-19 infections. J. Lipid Res. 2021;62:100067. doi: 10.1016/j.jlr.2021.100067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Acosta-Ampudia Y., Monsalve D.M., Rojas M., Rodriguez Y., Gallo J.E., Salazar-Uribe J.C., Santander M.J., Cala M.P., Zapata W., Zapata M.I., Manrique R., Pardo-Oviedo J.M., Camacho B., Ramirez-Santana C., Anaya J.M. COVID-19 convalescent plasma composition and immunological effects in severe patients. J. Autoimmun. 2021;118:102598. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2021.102598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Xu J., Zhou M., Luo P., Yin Z., Wang S., Liao T., Yang F., Wang Z., Yang D., Peng Y., Geng W., Li Y., Zhang H., Yang J. Plasma metabolomic profiling of patients recovered from COVID-19 with pulmonary sequelae 3 months after discharge. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Wu Q., Zhou L., Sun X., Yan Z., Hu C., Wu J., Xu L., Li X., Liu H., Yin P., Li K., Zhao J., Li Y., Wang X., Li Y. Altered lipid metabolism in recovered SARS patients twelve years after infection. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:9110. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09536-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Shen B., Yi X., Sun Y., Bi X., Du J., Zhang C., Quan S., Zhang F., Sun R., Qian L., Ge W., Liu W., Liang S., Chen H., Zhang Y. Proteomic and metabolomic characterization of COVID-19 patient sera. Cell. 2020;182:59–72.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Song J.W., Lam S.M., Fan X., Cao W.J., Wang S.Y., Tian H., Chua G.H., Zhang C., Meng F.P., Xu Z., Fu J.L., Huang L., Xia P., Yang T., Zhang S. Omics-driven systems interrogation of metabolic dysregulation in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Cell Metab. 2020;32:188–202.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Winkler M.S., Martz K.B., Nierhaus A., Daum G., Schwedhelm E., Kluge S., Graler M.H. Loss of sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) in septic shock is predominantly caused by decreased levels of high-density lipoproteins (HDL) J. Intensive Care. 2019;7:23. doi: 10.1186/s40560-019-0376-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Walsh K.B., Teijaro J.R., Wilker P.R., Jatzek A., Fremgen D.M., Das S.C., Watanabe T., Hatta M., Shinya K., Suresh M., Kawaoka Y., Rosen H., Oldstone M.B. Suppression of cytokine storm with a sphingosine analog provides protection against pathogenic influenza virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011;108:12018–12023. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107024108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Teijaro J.R., Walsh K.B., Cahalan S., Fremgen D.M., Roberts E., Scott F., Martinborough E., Peach R., Oldstone M.B., Rosen H. Endothelial cells are central orchestrators of cytokine amplification during influenza virus infection. Cell. 2011;146:980–991. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Teijaro J.R., Walsh K.B., Rice S., Rosen H., Oldstone M.B. Mapping the innate signaling cascade essential for cytokine storm during influenza virus infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014;111:3799–3804. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400593111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Zhao J., Zhu M., Jiang H., Shen S., Su X., Shi Y. Combination of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1PR1) agonist and antiviral drug: a potential therapy against pathogenic influenza virus. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:5272. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41760-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 126.Seo Y.J., Blake C., Alexander S., Hahm B. Sphingosine 1-phosphate-metabolizing enzymes control influenza virus propagation and viral cytopathogenicity. J. Virol. 2010;84:8124–8131. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00510-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Seo Y.J., Pritzl C.J., Vijayan M., Bomb K., McClain M.E., Alexander S., Hahm B. Sphingosine kinase 1 serves as a pro-viral factor by regulating viral RNA synthesis and nuclear export of viral ribonucleoprotein complex upon influenza virus infection. PLoS One. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Xia C., Seo Y.J., Studstill C.J., Vijayan M., Wolf J.J., Hahm B. Transient inhibition of sphingosine kinases confers protection to influenza A virus infected mice. Antiviral Res. 2018;158:171–177. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2018.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Vijayan M., Xia C., Song Y.E., Ngo H., Studstill C.J., Drews K., Fox T.E., Johnson M.C., Hiscott J., Kester M., Alexander S., Hahm B. Sphingosine 1-phosphate lyase enhances the activation of IKKepsilon to promote type I IFN-mediated innate immune responses to influenza A virus infection. J. Immunol. 2017;199:677–687. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Yan Q., Li P., Ye X., Huang X., Feng B., Ji T., Chen Z., Li F., Zhang Y., Luo K., Chen F., Mo X., Wang J., Feng L., Hu F. Longitudinal peripheral blood transcriptional analysis reveals molecular signatures of disease progression in COVID-19 patients. J. Immunol. 2021;206:2146–2159. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2001325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Schwarz B., Sharma L., Roberts L., Peng X., Bermejo S., Leighton I., Casanovas-Massana A., Minasyan M., Farhadian S., Ko A.I., Yale I.T., Dela Cruz C.S., Bosio C.M. Cutting edge: severe SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans is defined by a shift in the serum lipidome, resulting in dysregulation of eicosanoid immune mediators. J. Immunol. 2021;206:329–334. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2001025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Snider J.M., You J.K., Wang X., Snider A.J., Hallmark B., Seeds M.C., Sergeant S., Johnstone L., Wang Q., Sprissler R., Zhang H.H., Luberto C., Kew R.R., Hannun Y.A., McCall C.E. Group IIA secreted phospholipase A2 plays a central role in the pathobiology of COVID-19. J. Clin. Invest. 2021;131:ei49236. doi: 10.1172/JCI149236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Lipid Research are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES