Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 14;2012(11):CD006145. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006145.pub3

Courneya 2007b.

Study characteristics
Methods see Courneya 2007a
Participants see Courneya 2007a
Interventions see Courneya 2007a
Outcomes see Courneya 2007a
Notes see Courneya 2007a
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "randomly assigned...using a computer generated program"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "The allocation sequence was...concealed from the project directors at each site who assigned participants to groups"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes High risk Blinding not done
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk All participants were accounted for
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Fatigue outcome reported