Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 14;2012(11):CD006145. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006145.pub3

Segal 2003.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT; 2 groups, random numbers table, stratification for centre and intent of treatment
Participants 155 prostate cancer patients, due to receive androgen deprivation therapy
Interventions Exercise: individualised resistance training. 9 exercises at 60% to 70% 1 RM, 3 times/week for 12 weeks.
Control: wait list
Outcomes Fatigue
HRQOL
Muscular fitness
Body composition
Notes Methodological quality score: 2
Main purpose of exercise: to improve quality of life and reduce fatigue
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "Randomization, performed using a table of random numbers"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "The treatment allocation was concealed from the study coordinator until completion of baseline testing and stratification"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes High risk Blinding not done
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk Reasons for drop‐out not provided and data not included within an intention‐to‐treat analysis.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Fatigue outcome reported