Table 5.

Effects of defatted rice bran source and processing technology on the AID (%) of dietary nutrients¹

	Method
	Pressed							Solvent-extracted
	Source No.										P-value
Items2	1	2	3	4	5	7	9	6	8	SEM	Source	Method
GE	86.18	81.61	74.94	77.51	81.83	81.53	83.71	78.51	72.30	3.03	0.204	0.033
DM	84.33	79.08	80.34	75.96	79.43	78.52	80.92	75.09	69.76	1.729	<0.01	0.047
Ash	34.37	20.63	22.57	14.42	22.73	13.44	24.09	17.02	13.16	2.173	<0.01	<0.01
OM	87.88	83.57	78.39	80.47	83.77	83.38	85.12	80.24	72.68	2.736	0.229	0.026
EE	84.89	88.32	81.30	90.78	86.07	83.90	82.97	83.98	62.56	5.617	0.124	0.098
CP	77.78	72.59	62.60	61.48	74.28	77.83	78.91	76.15	57.76	5.299	0.065	0.023
TDF	37.77	11.79	32.26	21.63	23.73	13.10	16.72	17.18	20.86	4.432	<0.01	0.992
SDF	44.98	19.00	35.78	22.67	31.19	25.33	34.99	7.55	42.77	6.325	0.23	<0.01
IDF	30.58	14.76	31.63	18.86	22.55	11.52	12.80	16.06	13.71	3.731	0.014	0.353
NDF	55.29	18.65	46.32	33.38	27.93	8.74	19.66	19.03	7.09	2.684	<0.01	<0.01
ADF	45.23	9.42	40.04	27.44	9.37	6.93	11.17	21.20	4.09	1.581	<0.01	<0.01
Hemicellulose	63.74	24.89	40.89	37.91	40.44	11.60	26.50	21.93	23.29	5.035	<0.01	0.130

¹Data represent least-square means (n = 6), and individual pig was treated as the experimental unit.

²Source, effects of nine different sources of DFRB; Method, effects of oil extraction methods: pressed DFRB vs. solvent-extracted DFRB. Sources of DFRB are described in Table 1.