Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 29.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Rep. 2021 Sep 14;36(11):109700. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109700

Table 1.

Summary of selection and counterselection markers

Marker Species origin Encoded protein Reference Marker size (bp) Drug(s)a Solvent Bacterial selection (μg/mL) Drosophila size ESC/ECC (μg/mL) Cost ($/vial)

Resistance markers
nptII Klebsiella pneumoniae neomycin phosphotransferase II Davies and Smith, 1978 795 kanamycin (bacteria), G418 sulfate (geneticin) MQ H2O 30 350 0.07
pac Streptomyces alboniger puromycin N-acetyltransferase Vara et al., 1985 600 puromycin HCl MQ H2O 100 250–500 2.32– 4.64
bsr b Bacillus cereus blasticidin S-resistance Itaya et al., 1990 423 blasticidin S MQ H2O 100 25–45 0.41– 0.73
hph c Escherichia coli hygromycin B phosphotransferase Gritz and Davies, 1983 1,026 hygromycin B MQ H2O 75 35–45 0.04– 0.05
ble d Streptoalleteichus hindustanus bleomycin resistance protein Oliva-Trastoy et al., 2005 375 zeocin or phleomycin 1M HEPES 25 or – 350 – or 9.35
Sensitivity markers
sr39TK e herpes simplex virus-1 thymidine kinase Black et al., 2001 1,131 ganciclovir 0.1N NaOH 4 0.01– 0.04
FCU1 e Saccharomyces cerevisiae FCU1 Erbs et al., 2000 1,122 5-fluorocytosine 1×PBS 10–15 <0.01

The efficacy of seven different markers (five selection and two counterselection) were tested for in vivo selection and counterselection in Drosophila melanogaster. For each marker, we established an effective selection and counterselection concentration (ESC and ECC) defined as the minimal amount of drug required to either eliminate all non-resistant flies without significantly affecting resistance marker expressing fly viability or to eliminate all sensitivity-marker-expressing flies without significantly affecting non-sensitive flies. For the five selection markers, selection concentrations were also determined for use in bacteria.

a

Drugs used to determine cost were G418 sulfate (VWR 97063-060), puromycin HCl (VWR 97064-280), blasticidin S (VWR 71002-676), hygromycin B (VWR AAJ6068103), phleomycin (VWR AAJ67027-8EQ), ganciclovir (TCI America 50-155-694), and 5-fluorocytosine (TCI America 50-014-34810).

b

Although basal marker expression is enough to confer effective drug resistance when expressed from tested genomic docking sites, heat-shockenhanced expression is required when inserted into low-expressing genomic loci. Lower marker expression is also associated with blasticidin-S-related toxicity in resistant animals at higher concentrations (≥50 μg/mL).

c

Effective hygromycin B resistance requires heat-shock-enhanced expression in all tested contexts.

d

Zeocin was found ineffective at selecting flies. Phleomycin is a poorly effective selection agent, with high-ESC, batch-specific variability.

e

At higher concentrations, both tested counterselection drugs show general toxicity, with ganciclovir exhibiting toxicity above 15 μg/mL and 5-fluorocytosine above 50 μg/mL.