Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 29;50(1):85–107. doi: 10.1007/s11747-021-00808-9

Table 3.

Comparisons of alternative HLM models†

Model AIC -2 Log Likelihood Chi-Square Value df Critical Chi-Square (p = 0.05) Result
No predictors, random intercepts for country and store level only 6,155,857 6,155,849 Base model; intercepts significant; random model appropriate at country level
Add 19 fixed effects at country level 4,323,539 4,323,493 -1,832,356 19 96,439.8 Reject null of no fixed effects
Add 14 random effects at country and store levels 4,283,309 4,283,239 -40,254 14 2875.3 Reject null of no random effects
Add 8 fixed (hypothesized) interaction effects 4,281,425 4,281,331 -1908 8 238.5 Reject null of no hypothesized interaction effects
Add 6 fixed interaction effects for regions and discrete emotions 4,279,246 4,279,136 -2195 6 365.8 Reject null of no interaction effects for regions and discrete emotions

Each model is compared to the model above it. The chi-square value is the difference between the -2 Log Likelihood values for the two models. The degrees of freedom are the difference in the number of parameters. The final model has 2,189,063 observations