Table 4.
Generalized ordered logit models.
Sexting type 1 |
Sexting type 2 |
Sexting type 3 |
Sexting type 4 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | S.E. | Exp (β) | B | S.E. | Exp (β) | B | S.E. | Exp (β) | B | S.E. | Exp (β) | |
Predictors | ||||||||||||
Age | 0.026 | 0.125 | 1.027 | −0.211 | 0.121 | 0.810 | 0.006 | 0.193 | 1.006 | 0.130 | 0.256 | 1.139 |
Educational level | 0.137 | 0.166 | 1.147 | −0.094 | 0.164 | 0.911 | −0.144 | 0.234 | 0.866 | −0.226 | 0.306 | 0.798 |
Sex | −0.360 | 0.338 | 0.698 | −0.175 | 0.324 | 0.839 | 0.646 | 0.490 | 1.907 | 0.188 | 0.585 | 1.206 |
Relationship status | 1.096 | 0.347 | 2.992∗∗ | 0.549 | 0.341 | 1.732 | 1.399 | 0.521 | 4.052∗∗ | 1.120 | 0.662 | 3.065 |
Sexual orientation | −0.930 | 0.540 | 0.394 | 0.419 | 0.498 | 1.520 | 1.463 | 0.606 | 4.317 | 1.568 | 0.720 | 4.795∗ |
Developmental stage | 0.502 | 0.326 | 1.651 | −0.188 | 0.312 | 0.829 | 0.612 | 0.477 | 1.845 | 0.987 | 0.653 | 2.682 |
Arousal | 0.552 | 0.130 | 1.736∗∗∗ | 0.320 | 0.126 | 1.377∗∗ | 0.454 | 0.166 | 1.575∗∗ | 0.481 | 0.235 | 1.618∗ |
Intimacy | 0.052 | 0.119 | 1.053 | −0.137 | 0.120 | 0.872 | −0.037 | 0.153 | 0.964 | −0.009 | 0.194 | 0.991 |
Relational affirmation | −0.054 | 0.135 | 0.947 | 0.333 | 0.128 | 1.395∗∗ | −0.002 | 0.163 | 0.998 | −0.169 | 0.194 | 0.844 |
Partner pressure | 0.125 | 0.192 | 1.133 | 0.030 | 0.165 | 1.031 | 0.630 | 0.236 | 1.878∗∗ | 0.887 | 0.323 | 2.429∗∗ |
Peer approval | −0.018 | 0.213 | 0.983 | −0.083 | 0.185 | 0.921 | −0.244 | 0.259 | 0.783 | −0.207 | 0.312 | 0.813 |
Body acceptance | −0.197 | 0.112 | 0.821 | 0.046 | 0.103 | 1.047 | 0.042 | 0.137 | 1.042 | 0.106 | 0.167 | 1.112 |
Boredom | 0.052 | 0.113 | 1.053 | −0.034 | 0.108 | 0.967 | 0.284 | 0.154 | 1.328 | 0.351 | 0.204 | 1.420 |
Stress | 0.146 | 0.148 | 1.157 | 0.142 | 0.145 | 1.153 | 0.159 | 0.185 | 1.173 | 0.632 | 0.274 | 1.881∗ |
Loneliness | −0.145 | 0.128 | 0.865 | −0.082 | 0.120 | 0.921 | −0.109 | 0.169 | 0.897 | −0.202 | 0.217 | 0.817 |
Note. Gratifications sought for sexting during the COVID-19 pandemic were only asked to adolescents who indicated that they engaged at least once in one of the four sexting types (N = 222). As such, this subsample was used. Sexting types in this study are ordinal data. First category = no engagement in the particular sexting type (but respondents did engage in another sexting type). Second category = low frequencies of the sexting type (i.e., less than once per month and one to three times per month). Third category = middle frequencies of the sexting type (i.e., once per week to several times per week). Fourth category = high frequencies of the sexting type (i.e., each day to several times per day). Sex was coded as 0 = boys and 1 = girls. Developmental status was coded as 0 = early developmental stage and 1 = advanced developmental stage. Sexual orientation was coded as 0 = heterosexual and 1 = non-heterosexual. Relationship status was coded as 0 = single and 1 = in a relationship. ∗p < .05. ∗∗p < .01. ∗∗∗p < .001.