Skip to main content
. 2021 May 31;110:135–149. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.05.030

Table 3.

ESM + EMD analysis result for 16 Districts in Beijing.

District Name Abnormal Travel Rate (AT) Average Abnormal
Travel Rate (AAT)
Sig. Two-tailed(P-value)
Changping Dist. −7.531077193 −21.52% 0.000***
Chaoyang Dist. −4.878891757 −13.94% 0.000***
Daxing Dist. −6.055480207 −17.30% 0.000***
Dongcheng Dist. −7.00047346 −20.00% 0.000***
Fangshang Dist. −10.87323249 −31.07% 0.000***
Fengtai Dist. −15.505 −44.30% 0.000***
Haidian Dist. −15.26172735 −43.60% 0.000***
Huairou Dist. −2.094791421 −5.99% 0.000***
Mengtougou Dist. −9.5823562 −27.38% 0.000***
Miyun Dist. −9.479246297 −27.08% 0.000***
Pinggu Dist. 0.450861732 1.29% 0.000***
Shingjingshan Dist. −8.447487903 −24.14% 0.000***
Shunyi Dist. −8.608088075 −24.59% 0.000***
Tongzhou Dist. −4.836302224 −13.82% 0.000***
Xicheng Dist. −12.90058944 −36.86% 0.000***
Yanqin Dist. −5.281059367 −15.09% 0.000***
Overall −3.028768057 −8.65% 0.000***

Note: *** represents significance at 99% confidence level.