Table 1.
Baseline Char. | Unable to afford MHS | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | % | AOR | 95% CI | p > |t| | % unable to afford MHS | ||
1A | |||||||
Race | 14,655 | ||||||
White | 12,703 | 88.77 | 1.00 | - | - | - | 2.57 |
Non-white | 1952 | 11.23 | 1.27 | 0.84 | 1.94 | 0.260 | 3.14 |
Age | 14,655 | ||||||
18–64 | 6799 | 51.80 | 1.00 | - | - | - | 4.6 |
65–74 | 4008 | 25.57 | 0.30 | 0.19 | 0.49 | < 0.001 | 0.8 |
≥ 75 | 3848 | 22.63 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.25 | < 0.001 | 0.22 |
Sex | 14,655 | ||||||
Male | 5881 | 42.24 | 1.00 | - | - | - | 1.54 |
Female | 8774 | 57.76 | 1.58 | 1.12 | 2.25 | 0.010 | 3.44 |
Kessler score | 14,655 | ||||||
K6 = 0 | 6176 | 42.13 | 1.00 | - | - | - | 0.32 |
K6 = 1–6 | 6203 | 42.71 | 3.50 | 1.74 | 7.02 | < 0.001 | 1.45 |
K6 = 7–12 | 1637 | 10.98 | 15.78 | 8.03 | 31.01 | < 0.001 | 8.34 |
K6 = 13–18 | 496 | 3.29 | 40.42 | 19.58 | 83.43 | < 0.001 | 21.83 |
K6 = 19–24 | 143 | 0.89 | 54.58 | 22.09 | 134.88 | < 0.001 | 28.09 |
Insurance status | 14,655 | ||||||
Insured | 13,912 | 94.88 | 1.00 | - | - | - | 1.95 |
Uninsured | 743 | 5.12 | 3.49 | 2.47 | 4.92 | < 0.001 | 15.45 |
Socioeconomic status (SES) | 14,655 | ||||||
SES < 1.00 | 649 | 3.71 | 1.00 | - | - | - | 9.51 |
SES 1.00–1.99 | 3560 | 19.98 | 1.18 | 0.75 | 1.85 | 0.484 | 4.83 |
SES 2.00–3.99 | 4814 | 32.47 | 0.85 | 0.53 | 1.38 | 0.517 | 2.55 |
SES > 4.00 | 5632 | 43.84 | 0.51 | 0.29 | 0.89 | 0.018 | 1.12 |
1B | |||||||
Insurance status | 14,655 | ||||||
Insured | 13,912 | 94.88 | 1.00 | - | - | - | 1.95 |
K6 ≥ 13 vs. K6 ≤ 13 | - | - | 7.20 | 4.77 | 10.86 | < 0.001 | 17.91 vs. 1.33 |
Uninsured | 743 | 5.12 | 3.49 | 2.47 | 4.92 | < 0.001 | 15.45 |
K6 ≥ 13 vs. K6 < 13 | - | - | 8.68 | 4.45 | 16.93 | < 0.001 | 50.49 vs. 10.15 |
1C | |||||||
Socioeconomic status (SES) | 14,655 | ||||||
SES < 1.00 | 649 | 3.71 | 1.00 | - | - | - | 9.51 |
K6 ≥ 13 vs. K6 < 13 | - | 6.16 | 2.70 | 14.02 | < 0.001 | 26.67 vs. 5.93 | |
SES 1.00–1.99 | 3560 | 19.98 | 1.18 | 0.75 | 1.85 | 0.484 | 4.83 |
K6 ≥ 13 vs. K6 < 13 | - | - | 6.56 | 3.85 | 11.18 | < 0.001 | 26.39 vs. 3.07 |
SES 2.00–3.99 | 4814 | 32.47 | 0.85 | 0.53 | 1.38 | 0.517 | 2.55 |
K6 ≥ 13 vs. K6 < 13 | - | - | 12.31 | 6.53 | 23.22 | < 0.001 | 22.24 vs. 1.74 |
SES ≥ 4.00 | 5632 | 43.84 | 0.51 | 0.29 | 0.89 | 0.018 | 1.12 |
K6 ≥ 13 vs. K6 < 13 | - | - | 9.02 | 3.85 | 21.14 | < 0.001 | 15.12 vs. 0.88 |
1A represents the entire cohort. In addition to the variables shown, the model was also adjusted for highest education level attained (less than high school [referent] vs. some high school vs. high school diploma/GED vs. some college vs. college degree or greater), US geographic region (Northeast [referent] vs. Midwest vs. South vs. West), self-reported health status (excellent vs. very good vs. good vs. fair vs. poor [referent]), time from cancer diagnosis (≤ 5 years [referent] vs. ≥ 6 years), birth status (US born [referent] vs. non-US born), and comorbidity score (0 [referent] vs. 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 vs. 4 vs. 5 comorbid conditions), none of which was significant. 1B and 1C show the results of multivariable logistic regression stratified by insurance status and socioeconomic status, respectively. Each of these models was also adjusted for all of the demographic characteristics listed above