Table 4.
The comparison results of the genetic diversity for raccoons between Chiba prefecture, Japan and other areas.
| Area | Number of loci | He | He of Chiba | P-value | Theses | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native area | Ontario | 7 | 0.84 | 0.79 | 1.00 | Cullingham et al. (2006)29 |
| Indiana | 9 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.18 | Fike et al. (2007)30 | |
| Illinois | 7 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 1.00 | Santonastaso et al. (2012)43 | |
| Missouri | 8 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.29 | Alda et al. (2013)41 | |
| Invasion area | Germany, Czech, and Poland | 11 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.23 | Biedryzycka et al. (2014)42 |
| Germany | 16 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.21 | Fischer et al. (2015)40 | |
| Spain | 8 | 0.62 | 0.74 | 0.07 | Alda et al. (2013)41 | |
| Hokkaido | 5 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 1.00 | Okuyama et al. (2020)19 |
Number of loci the number of loci that we used for comparison, He mean of expected heterozygosity, P-value The P-value that was calculated a result of sign test.