Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 16;15:739175. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.739175

Table 3.

Statistical concurrence observed across ReHo studies on OCD.

Region Local maximum Cluster Jackknife sensitivity analysis (combination of studies detecting the differences)
MNI Coordinates SDM-Z P Number of voxels Breakdown (number of voxel)
Higher ReHo (OCD > HCS)
Left inferior frontal gyrus −48 34 0 3.203 ~0 2023 Left inferior frontal gyrus (1663) 10 out of 10
Left middle frontal gyrus (202)
Left insula (158)
Right inferior frontal gyrus 48 36 −10 1.942 0.000668841 408 Right inferior frontal gyrus (370) 8 out of 10
Right middle frontal gyrus (38)
Left orbitofrontal gyrus −10 50 −16 1.792 0.001478572 587 Left orbitfrontal gyrus (339) 8 out of 10
Right orbitfrontal gyrus (248)
Lower ReHo (OCD < HCS)
Right supplementary motor area 6 −20 66 −1.996 0.000082057 1443 Left paracentral lobule (327) 10 out of 10
Left supplementary motor area (129)
Right paracentral lobule (363)
Right precentral gyrus (96)
Right supplementary motor area (528)
Left cerebellum −14 −52 −24 −1.605 0.001129702 269 Left cerebellum (269) 9 out of 10
Right cerebellum 20 −58 −26 −1.604 0.001129702 160 Left cerebellum (160) 9 out of 10

HCS, healthy control subjects; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; OCD, obsessive-compulsive disorder; ReHo, regional homogeneity; SDM, seed-based d mapping.