Table 4.
Impact of nano-silicon dioxide (nano-SiO2) foliar application on antioxidant activity (%), flavonoids content (μg QE/g), and phenolic content (μg GAE/g) of faba beans (Vicia faba) under well-watered or drought-stressed conditions.
Studied factor | Antioxidant activity (%) | Flavonoids content (μg QE/g extract) | Phenolic content (μg GAE/g extract) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Irrigation | ||||
Well-watered | 81.43b | 106.7b | 1,467b | |
Droughted | 89.50a | 134.8a | 2,182a | |
Foliar | ||||
Control (tap water) | 82.06d | 103.5b | 1,482d | |
0.5 mM nano-SiO2 (T1) | 84.24c | 113.4b | 1,805c | |
1 mM nano-SiO2 (T2) | 86.24b | 128.5a | 1,945b | |
1.5 mM nano-SiO2 (T3) | 89.31a | 137.6a | 2,066a | |
Interaction | ||||
Well-watered | Control | 77.03f | 87.68d | 1,275g |
T1 | 80.10e | 95.90d | 1,398f | |
T2 | 83.13d | 115.3cd | 1,512e | |
T3 | 85.45c | 127.8bc | 1,682d | |
Drought stress | Control | 87.09c | 119.3bcd | 1,688d |
T1 | 88.38bc | 130.9bc | 2,211c | |
T2 | 89.35b | 141.7b | 2,377b | |
T3 | 93.17a | 147.4a | 2,450a | |
ANOVA | DF | |||
Irrigation (I) | 1 | 0.013 | 0.039 | <0.001 |
Foliar (F) | 3 | <0.001 | 0.019 | <0.001 |
I × F | 3 | 0.003 | 0.015 | <0.001 |
Means followed by the same letters under the same factor are not significantly different by least significant difference at p ≤ 0.05.
QE, quercetin; GAE, galic acid.