Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 23;36(3):252–260. doi: 10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_20_21

Table 4.

Results of univariate survival analysis

Variables Cumulative survival proportion at 1 year Log-rank test P HR (95% CI) P-value (Cox-regression)
Metabolic parameters
 MTVwb
  ≥158.56 (n=23) versus 26.1 0.032 2.542 (1.050-6.158) 0.039
  <158.56 (n=19) 63.2
Texture parameters (first order)
 Mean
  ≤10.25 (n=22) versus 27.3 0.029 2.509 (1.070-5.884) 0.034
  >10.25 (n=20) 60.0
 Median 0.05
  ≤11.50 (n=19) versus 26.3 0.04 2.259 (1.00-5.104)
  >11.50 (n=23) 56.5
 RMS
  ≤11.27 (n=22) versus 27.3 0.029 2.509 (1.070-5.884) 0.034
  >11.27 (n=20) 60.0
Texture parameters (s order)
 Mean
  ≤10.45 (n=22) versus 27.3 0.029 2.509 (1.070-5.884) 0.034
  >10.45 (n=20) 60.0
 Auto-correlation
  ≤128.70 (n=22) versus 27.3 0.029 2.509 (1.070-5.884) 0.034
  >128.70 (n=20) 60.0
 Cluster prominence
  ≤20,526.42 (n=25) versus 24.0 0.004 3.929 (1.455-10.611) 0.007
  >20,526.42 (n=17) 70.6
 Cluster shade
  ≥−983 (n=23) versus 26.1 0.013 2.903 (1.198-7.034) 0.018
  <−983 (n=19) 63.2
 Sum average
  ≤22.51 (n=23) versus 26.1 0.012 2.954 (1.219-7.156) 0.016
  >22.51 (n=19) 63.2
 Sum variance
  ≤481.82 (n=21) versus 23.8 0.010 2.906 (1.237-6.825) 0.014
  >481.82 (n=21) 61.9

HR: Hazard ratio, CI: Confidence interval, MTVwb: Metabolic tumor volume whole-body, RMS: Root mean square