Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 16;12:691930. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.691930

Table 2.

Behavioral data of AUD, ADHD, and HC for the HRI-task.

AUD (N = 15) ADHD (N = 16) HC (N = 15) ANOVAa/Welchb
Reaction time congruent trials [ms; mean ± SD] 553 ± 108 490 ± 108 507 ± 105 F(2,43) = 1.40, p = 0.257a
Reaction time incongruent trials [ms; mean ± SD] 643 ± 105 594 ± 111 609 ± 100 F(2,43) = 0.87, p = 0.425a
Commission errors (no-go) (%; mean ± SD) 1.4 ± 2.21 10.2 ± 14.61 3.6 ± 4.6 F(2, 23.1)=3.77, p=0.038b
Omission errors (no-go) (%; mean ± SD) 3.6 ± 6.8 2.4 ± 2.7 6.8 ± 16.6 F(2,21.5) = 0.65, p = 0.531b
Failure to stop (%; mean ± SD) 41.1 ± 11.7 49.1 ± 13.0 42.3 ± 13.0 F(2,43) = 1.81, p = 0.176a
Interference effect (ms; mean ± SD) 90 ± 74 103 ± 58 101 ± 48 F(2,43) = 0.22, p = 0.807a
Stop-signal reaction time (ms; mean ± SD) 261 ± 52 277 ± 692 228 ± 642 F(2, 43)=2.47, p=0.097a2

ANOVA, one-way analysis of variance; a/bANOVAa/Welchb for group differences;

1

post-hoc test, P < 0.05;

2

In direct comparison, ADHD had significantly higher stop-signal reaction time than HC (two sample t-Test t(29) = 2.05, p = 0.025).

Significant results are highlightes in bold characters.