Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 16;12:739966. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.739966

TABLE 4.

Overview of means, mean differences and p-values across Verbal Learning Tasks.

Study Serotonergic psychedelic Control Weight Mean difference
Mean (SD) N Mean (SD) N
VLTLong delayed recall (p = 0.94; I2= 43%)
Barbosa et al. (2016)* 12.58 (2.8) 29 13.0 (2.09) 27 16.5% −0.42 [−1.71, 0.87]
Doering-Silveira et al. (2005a) 12.4 (1.93) 40 12.93 (1.55) 40 30.9% −0.53 [−1.30, 0.24]
Grob et al. (1996) 9.53 (2.64) 15 8.41 (1.62) 15 12.2% 1.12 [−0.45, 2.69]
Halpern et al. (2005) 12.2 (1.4) 61 11.9 (1.9) 78 40.4% 0.30 [−0.25, 0.85]
VLTTrial 5 (p = 0.68; I2= 69%)
Barbosa et al. (2016)* 13.17 (2.37) 29 13.44 (1.93) 27 32.3% −0.33 [−1.03, 0.37]
Doering-Silveira et al. (2005b) 12.9 (1.5) 40 13.23 (1.72) 40 40.8% −0.27 [−1.40, 0.86]
Grob et al. (1996) 11.21 (1.93) 15 9.5 (2.07) 15 26.8% 1.71 [0.28, 3.14]
VLTShort recall after interference (p = 0.93; I2= 57%)
Barbosa et al. (2016)* 12.17 (2.76) 30 12.37 (2.20) 27 31.5% −0.20 [-1.49, 1.09]
Doering-Silveira et al. (2005a) 12.15 (1.9) 40 12.83 (1.58) 40 45.0% −0.68 [−1.45, 0.09]
Grob et al. (1996) 9.53 (2.72) 15 8.16 (1.99) 15 23.4% 1.37 [−0.34, 3.08]
VLT–Recognition (p = 0.84; I 2 = 31%)
Barbosa et al. (2016)* 15.25 (1.03) 29 15.19 (0.96) 27 32.1% 0.06 [−0.46, 0.58]
Doering-Silveira et al. (2005b) 14.55 (0.82) 40 14.78 (0.62) 40 55.6% −0.23 [−0.55, 0.09]
Grob et al. (1996) 14.3 (0.72) 15 13.75 (1.76) 15 12.3% 0.58 [−0.38, 1.54]

* = Means and standard deviation courtesy of Barbosa et al.; N, sample size; SD, standard deviation; VLT, Verbal Learning Task