Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 18;14(10):1571–1580. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.10.15

Table 6. Comparison of the mean CMT between each group and baseline values.

CMT (µm) Baseline evaluation Following evaluation visit P Effect size, r
Naïve patients
 Baseline-2wk (n=10) 478.00±134.27 411.60±101.31 0.008 0.789
 Baseline-Month 1 (n=12) 540.83±145.604 419.08±130.44 0.002 0.779
 Baseline-Month 2 (n=25) 522.24±117.355 348.88±70.30 0.000 0.764
 Baseline-Month 3 (n=11) 523.18±110.793 390.82±132.67 0.016 0.524
 Baseline-Month 4 (n=22) 529.50±124.683 429.86±128.17 0.001 0.464
 Baseline-Month 6 (n=18) 464.44±75.010 408.06±109.17 0.017 0.571
Non-naïve patients
 Baseline-2wk (n=4) 803.00±308.299 681.00±325.27 --a --
 Baseline-Month 1 (n=3) 693.33±289.144 482.00±345.88 --a --
 Baseline-Month 2 (n=9) 500.67±145.128 346.00±142.20 0.008 0.454
 Baseline-Month 3 (n=6) 481.83±268.024 408.17±269.18 0.043 0.973
 Baseline-Month 4 (n=14) 453.71±126.508 381.43±142.97 0.016 0.183
 Baseline-Month 6 (n=9) 425.22±87.102 378.33±111.29 0.139 0.243

CMT: Central macular thickness; SD: Standard deviation. aNo comparison was performed for these 2 groups due to low number of patients.

mean±SD