Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 31;2015(10):CD007228. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007228.pub3

Balk 2008.

Methods Randomised controlled trial; intervention arm and control (usual care) arm.
Participants 214 patients with CHF and NYHA class I ‐ IV.
Mean age 66 years.
70% of participants were men.
The Netherlands.
Interventions Telemonitoring.
Participants in the Intervention group were provided a MOTIVA system (TV‐channel providing educational material, reminders of medication, health‐related surveys and motivational messages to encourage the prescribed lifestyle regimen) in addition to scheduled cardiologist appointments. A subgroup of intervention participants also received automated BP and weight devices that automatically communicated readings via the telephone (those who had been hospitalised in the prior year for HF). Participaent guidance followed a personalised plan.
Outcomes 288 days ‐ mean follow‐up.
All‐cause hospital days per year, days alive and out of hospital, quality of life, knowledge of disease, self care.
Funding source Study proposed and funded by the healthcare insurance company Achmea.
Philips‐ provision of the MOTIVA system.
Comparison Group(s) Control participants were followed by their cardiologists and HF nurses according to standard local practice.
All participants recorded all contacts with healthcare professionals and hospital admissions.
Notes Included in previous version of review (Inglis 2010).
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Randomisation was performed in a 1:1 ratio, in randomly permuted blocks of 30 per participating centre. Randomisation was independently performed...via a special Web‐based application".
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not detailed.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not detailed.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No evidence of incomplete outcome data.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective outcome reporting.