Table A2.
Results for the fully adjusted per covariates binary logistic regression model 4a considering bad performances as potential predictor and having TUG decline as outcome.
| TUG Decline | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Variable | OR | 95% C.I. | p-Value |
| Bad performances | 1.305 | 1.130–1.508 | <0.001 |
| SART mean RT | 1.000 | 0.999–1.002 | 0.791 |
| SART SD RT | 1.003 | 1.000–1.007 | 0.074 |
| Age | 1.102 | 1.080–1.125 | <0.001 |
| Females | 0.891 | 0.646–1.231 | 0.485 |
| Education level | |||
| - primary/none | [ref] | ||
| - secondary | 1.075 | 0.732–1.579 | 0.711 |
| - third/higher | 1.246 | 0.843–1.841 | 0.270 |
| Anxiety | 1.023 | 0.973–1.075 | 0.382 |
| Depression | 1.007 | 0.982–1.033 | 0.570 |
| Antihypertensives | 1.672 | 1.230–2.273 | 0.001 |
| Diabetes | 1.348 | 0.818–2.220 | 0.241 |
| Smoker | |||
| - never | [ref] | ||
| - past | 0.951 | 0.685–1.319 | 0.762 |
| - current | 1.581 | 0.989–2.529 | 0.056 |
| Drinking problem | |||
| - “No” | [ref] | ||
| - “Don’t know” | 0.660 | 0.178–2.443 | 0.534 |
| - “Yes” | 0.907 | 0.562–1.463 | 0.689 |
| UGS at baseline | 0.938 | 0.928–0.948 | <0.001 |
| IPAQ | |||
| - low | [ref] | ||
| - medium | 0.959 | 0.671–1.370 | 0.819 |
| - high | 0.815 | 0.554–1.199 | 0.299 |