Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep;13(9):5477–5486. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-3220

Table 3. Chart review of 79 adults with esophageal cancer in relation to nutritional procedure received up to 10 days after the start of neoadjuvant therapy. Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2010–2017.

Characteristic No procedure, N=20 J-tube, N=39 Stent, N=20 P value
Anatomic location
   Upper 0% 10% 5% 0.49f
   Middle 25% 18% 5%
   Lower 50% 54% 65%
   Gastroesophageal junction 25% 18% 25%
Adjuvant therapy
   Definitive 25% 28% 20% 0.79
   Preoperative 75% 72% 80%
Fistula at diagnosis 0% 0% 5% NE
Dysphagia at diagnosis 75% 100% 100% NE
Reason for intervention <0.001f
   Dysphagia NA 36%a 95%b
   Anticipated weight loss NA 49% 0%
   Actual weight loss NA 15%a 0%
   Fistula NA 0 5%b
Complication after intervention
   None vs. any 95% 26% 15% <0.001
   Pain 5% 10% 35%
   Bleeding NA 0% 25%
   Migration NA NA 35%
   Fistula NA 3% 5%
   Reflux NA 18% 10%
   Pneumonia NA 3% 5%
   Wound infection NA 26%c 10%
   J-tube device failure NA 64%d NA
   J-tube take-down for complications NA 13% NA
   Stent adjustment or removal NA NA 40%
Intervention ≥11 days after start of neoadjuvant therapye
   None 75% 85% 30% <0.001f
   Gastrostomy tube 15% 0% 10%
   J-tube 5% 10% 35%
   Stent 5% 5% 0%
   Nasal gastric tube 0% 0% 15%
   Total parenteral nutrition 0% 0% 10%
Final decision to go to surgery
   Yes 65% 51% 40% 0.28
   No, death 0% 5% 10%
   No, disease not cleared 5% 3% 0%
   No, metastatic disease 10% 13% 25%
   No, patient not fit for surgery 5% 13% 25%
   No, bowel perforation from J-tube 0% 3% 0%
   No, patient preference 0% 0% 5%
   No, surveillance 15% 10% 0%
   No, tumor too proximal 0% 3% 0%

a, one patient had both dysphagia and actual weight loss and is counted twice; b, one patient had dysphagia and fistula and is counted twice; c, included 9 wound infections and one urinary tract infection; d, device failures included clogging, falling out, and plug and cap problems; e, for patients classified with no procedure at entry into follow-up, this was their first intervention. For patients classified with j-tube or stent at entry into follow-up, this was their second intervention; f, Fisher’s exact test was used in place of chi square because of small cell counts. NE, not estimated; NA, not applicable.