Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 20;6(38):24866–24878. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c03723

Table 2. Comparison of Doped MnO2 Nanorods with Previous Study.

catalysis
antimicrobial activity
 
material degradation (%) time reference material conc S. aureus E. coli (mm) references
αFe2O3@GO 34   (59) AgNPs@meso MnOx 100 μg 12 mm 12 (60)
NiCoMnO4 75.9 10 h (61) Ag-doped MnO2 NPs 3.52 Ag doped in 2.48 μg of MnO2 NPs in 40 μL 14 mm 12 (62)
NiCoMnO4 92.3 40 h (61) Ag-doped MnO2 NPs 60 μg 3.2 ± 3 cm   (63)
PEDOT/GO/MnO2 92.7 7 h (64) GO-Ag NPs 100 μg/mL 28 mm 18 (65)
RGO/MnFe2O4 hybrid 79   (66) AgNPs@GO 5 mg/mL 15.2 ± 1.6 mm   (67)
GO/Mn3O4 composite 77   (68) CuONPs@GO 5 mg/mL   11.2 ± 1.5 (67)
RGO/MnO2 composite 66   (69) GO/CuONPs 5 mg/mL   12.5 ± 2.1 (70)
ZnG 85.71 2 h (71) GO/AgNPs 5 mg/mL 17.3 ± 2.3 mm   (70)
GO (6%)-doped MnO2 95 30 min present work GO (6%)-doped MnO2 1000 μg/mL 5.15 mm 3.15 present work