Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 29;14:46. doi: 10.1186/s13039-021-00568-9

Table 1.

Comparison of the clinical findings in patients with parital trisomy 4q

Taylor et al. [13] Stoll et al. [14] Mikelsaar et al. [15] Lundin et al. [16] Rinaldi et al. [17] Lin et al. [18] Egritas et al. [19] Velinov et al. [20] Cakmak−Genc et al. [21] White et al. [22] Our study
Case 1 Case 2
Duplication region 4q26-q35 4q26-qter 4q25-qter 4q27-q35 4q24-q35 4q28.1-q35 4q25-qter 4q25-qter 4q28-qter 4q24-qter 4q28.3-qter 4q28.3-qter
Deletion region 21q21.1-q22.3 9p24-pter Xq22-qter Xp21.3-p22.33 6p25.2-p25.3
Age/Sex 6.5/M 11/F 7/F 13/F 1/M 2.5/M 1.25/F NB/F NB/F 32/F 28/F Fetus
Growth retardation  +   +   +   +   +   +   +  NM IUGR
Intellectual disability  +   +   +   +   +   +  NM  +  NA
Microcephaly  +   +   +   +   +   +   +  NA
Low−set/malformed ears  +   +   +   +   +   +   +   +  NA
Retrognathia/micrognathia NM NM  +   +   +  NA
High/broad nasal bridge  +   +   +   +   +   +  NM  +   +  NA
Thumb anomalies NM  +   +   +  NM NA
Epicanthic folds NM NM NM  +  NM  +   +  NM NA
Congenital heart defect  +  NM  +  NM  +   +   + 
Renal hypoplasia NM NM  +  NM NA
Epilepsy  +  NM NM NM NM  +  NA
Other Factor X defect Choanal-atresia Cholestasis Choanal-atresia Secondary amenorrhea Short stature

−:absent; +: present, NA not applicable, NB new born, NM not mention, F female, M male, IUGR intrauterine growth restriction