Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 30;42(5):953–961. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/iraa218

Table 2.

Medical record review of each patient shown in video 1 and suppl. Video 2–15, including age, gender, burn mechanism, TBSA, TBSA and extremity treated with enzymatic debridement (ED), burn depth, post-ED therapy, and accordance with experts’ consensus in therapy decision (BQ1–15b) achieved in the survey

ED Application Post-ED Therapy
Video Age.Gender Burn Mechanism TBSA (%) Day TBSA (%) Location Burn Depth Conservative: Reepithealization (day) Operative: Surgery (day) Accordance with Experts’ Consensus in Therapy Decision (BQ1–15b)
Suppl. Video 2 25.M Scald by hot fat 9 0 4 Right lower arm 2b 6 No
Suppl. Video 3 16.M Gas explosion 19 0 8 Left hand 2b 5 Yes
Suppl. Video 4 41.M Scald by hot fat 31 0 6 Right hand 2a 18 No
Suppl. Video 5 22.M Scald by hot fat 50 0 12 Right lower arm 2b 2 Yes
Suppl. Video 6 43.M Flash fire 22 0 4 Right lower arm 2a 14 Yes
Suppl. Video 7 16.M Gas explosion 19 0 8 Left hand 2a 10 Yes
Suppl. Video 1 59.M Electric arc 65 0 5 Right upper arm 2b 7 Yes
Suppl. Video 8 48.F Flash fire 17 0 9 Left hand 2a 10 Yes
Suppl. Video 9 91.F Scald by hot water 18 2 10 Left lower arm 3 7 Yes
Suppl. Video 10 25.M Scald by hot fat 9 0 4 Right hand 2b 6 No
Suppl. Video 11 59.M Electric arc 65 0 5 Right hand 2b 7 No
Suppl. Video 12 22.M Scald by hot fat 50 0 12 Left hand 2b 2 Yes
Suppl. Video 13 36.M Fire flame 16 0 6 Left lower arm 2a 14 No
Suppl. Video 14 91.F Scald by hot water 18 2 10 Left upper leg 3 7 Yes
Suppl. Video 15 22.M Deflagration 14 0 5 Right hand 2b 5 Yes

B1–B15: patients’ clinical course and retrospective burn depth assessment.