Table 2.
Medical record review of each patient shown in video 1 and suppl. Video 2–15, including age, gender, burn mechanism, TBSA, TBSA and extremity treated with enzymatic debridement (ED), burn depth, post-ED therapy, and accordance with experts’ consensus in therapy decision (BQ1–15b) achieved in the survey
ED Application | Post-ED Therapy | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Video | Age.Gender | Burn Mechanism | TBSA (%) | Day | TBSA (%) | Location | Burn Depth | Conservative: Reepithealization (day) | Operative: Surgery (day) | Accordance with Experts’ Consensus in Therapy Decision (BQ1–15b) |
Suppl. Video 2 | 25.M | Scald by hot fat | 9 | 0 | 4 | Right lower arm | 2b | – | 6 | No |
Suppl. Video 3 | 16.M | Gas explosion | 19 | 0 | 8 | Left hand | 2b | – | 5 | Yes |
Suppl. Video 4 | 41.M | Scald by hot fat | 31 | 0 | 6 | Right hand | 2a | 18 | – | No |
Suppl. Video 5 | 22.M | Scald by hot fat | 50 | 0 | 12 | Right lower arm | 2b | – | 2 | Yes |
Suppl. Video 6 | 43.M | Flash fire | 22 | 0 | 4 | Right lower arm | 2a | 14 | – | Yes |
Suppl. Video 7 | 16.M | Gas explosion | 19 | 0 | 8 | Left hand | 2a | 10 | – | Yes |
Suppl. Video 1 | 59.M | Electric arc | 65 | 0 | 5 | Right upper arm | 2b | – | 7 | Yes |
Suppl. Video 8 | 48.F | Flash fire | 17 | 0 | 9 | Left hand | 2a | 10 | – | Yes |
Suppl. Video 9 | 91.F | Scald by hot water | 18 | 2 | 10 | Left lower arm | 3 | – | 7 | Yes |
Suppl. Video 10 | 25.M | Scald by hot fat | 9 | 0 | 4 | Right hand | 2b | – | 6 | No |
Suppl. Video 11 | 59.M | Electric arc | 65 | 0 | 5 | Right hand | 2b | – | 7 | No |
Suppl. Video 12 | 22.M | Scald by hot fat | 50 | 0 | 12 | Left hand | 2b | – | 2 | Yes |
Suppl. Video 13 | 36.M | Fire flame | 16 | 0 | 6 | Left lower arm | 2a | 14 | – | No |
Suppl. Video 14 | 91.F | Scald by hot water | 18 | 2 | 10 | Left upper leg | 3 | – | 7 | Yes |
Suppl. Video 15 | 22.M | Deflagration | 14 | 0 | 5 | Right hand | 2b | – | 5 | Yes |
B1–B15: patients’ clinical course and retrospective burn depth assessment.