Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 31;2016(8):CD007719. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007719.pub4

Coutsoudis 1991.

Methods Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial
Allocation sequence was generated using a table of random numbers
Unit of randomisation was individual participants
Treatment and placebo dropper (dispenser bottle) were number‐coded
Study duration was 7 months
Participants Inclusion criteria: measles severe enough to warrant hospital admission, measles cases with pneumonia and diarrhoea, age between 4 and 24 months
Exclusion criteria: mild cases of measles (without pneumonia and diarrhoea), children > 24 months, rash > 5 days, vitamin A administration before admission, children with laryngotracheobronchitis
Interventions Vitamin A versus placebo syrup
Investigators used the WHO‐recommended dose for vitamin A (54.5 mg for children < 12 months, 109 mg for children ≥ 12 months)
 Vitamin A given at admission, on days 2, 8 and 42
Follow‐up was 6 months
Outcomes Extent of pneumonia, duration of fever, diarrhoea and pneumonia, incidence of herpes stomatitis and laryngotracheobronchitis. Serum zinc, serum vitamin E, serum retinol, serum retinol‐binding protein (RBP), serum albumin and pre‐albumin, weight gain
Outcomes were measured on days 8, 42 and 6 months post‐intervention
Notes Study was carried out in 1989
Normal‐phase, high‐pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) using fluorescent detection was used to estimate serum retinol level
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Adequate: allocation sequence was generated by table of random numbers
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Adequate: treatment and placebo dropper (dispenser bottle) was number‐coded
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Adequate: double‐blind
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Missing outcome data for different outcomes at different times. Differential loss to follow‐up between groups
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All pre‐stated outcomes were reported
Other bias Low risk None known