Table 1.
Feasibility of Modifying Infant Behavioral Measures.
| Task | Feasibility of Remote Adaption | Construct | Preliminary Quality Rating (% Useable) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm Restraint Procedure | 3 | Negative Valence | 94% |
| Still Face Paradigm | 3 | Negative Valence | 96% |
| Barrier Task | 1 | Negative Valence | – |
| Unpredictable Toy/Spider Task | 1 | Negative Valence | – |
| Stranger Approach | 0 | Negative Valence | – |
| Mother-Child Free Play | 3 | Social Processing, | 97% |
| Don't task | 3 | Social Processing, Cognitive Processes | 95% |
| Do task | 3 | Social Processing, Cognitive Processes | 95% |
| Strange Situation | 0 | Social Processing, Negative Valence | – |
| Object Permanence | 3 | Cognitive Processes | 98% |
| 3-D Object | 1 | Cognitive Processes | – |
| Visual A-not-B (Delayed Response) | 1 | Cognitive Processes | – |
| Detour Reaching | 1 | Cognitive Processes | – |
| Snack delay | 2 | Cognitive Processes | 99% |
| Visual Attention Task | 3 | Cognitive Processes | 94% |
*Scale for feasibly of remote adaption of the behavioral task: 0 = remote administration not possible, 1 = administration possible but not feasible, 2 = administration feasible with modification, 3 = minimal/no modification needed. Quality of ratings (the percentage of videos that were administered that were deemed usable) are reported on the subset of videos that have been assessed at OHSU and NYU at the time of this report (n = 348 for most tasks).