Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 27;56(10):546–552. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104379

Table 1.

Participant demographic information

Variable All
n=334
WLC
n=83
HIIT
n=82
Yoga
n=86
HIIT+yoga
n=83
Baseline comparison
Age, years (SD) 40.3 (12.4) 41.0 (12.1) 41.2 (12.7) 37.8 (12.3) 41.1 (12.6) F(3, 329)=1.45, p=0.23
CESD, score (SD) 10.3 (5.78) 10.4 (5.54) 10.8 (6.23) 10.4 (5.87) 9.41 (5.43) F(3, 330)=0.89, p=0.45
Women, n (%) 289 (87) 74 (89) 71 (87) 72 (84) 72 (87) X 2 (3, n=334)=1.08, p=0.78
Income, n (%)* X 2 (15, n=334)=18.77, p=0.22
 0–40 000 30 (9) 4 (5) 11 (13) 9 (10) 6 (7)
 40 001–80 000 68 (20) 16 (19) 12 (15) 24 (28) 16 (19)
 80 001–120 000 66 (20) 19 (23) 14 (17) 14 (16) 19 (23)
 120 001–160 000 51 (15) 11 (13) 12 (15) 18 (21) 10 (12)
 160 000+ 63 (19) 20 (24) 14 (17) 11 (13) 18 (22)
 No response 56 (17) 13 (16) 19 (23) 10 (12) 14 (17)
Employment status† X 2 (12, n=334)=6.11, p=0.91
 Full time 177 (53) 50 (60) 40 (49) 40 (47) 47 (57)
 Part time 44 (13) 10 (12) 13 (16) 13 (15) 8 (10)
 Not working 48 (14) 9 (11) 14 (17) 14 (16) 11 (13)
 Student 45 (13) 10 (12) 10 (12) 14 (16) 11 (13)
 Other 20 (6) 4 (5) 5 (6) 5 (6) 6 (7)
Education‡ X 2 (12, n=334)=12.83, p=0.38
 High school or less 22 (7) 3 (4) 3 (4) 10 (12) 6 (7)
 College, trade school or certificate 52 (16) 10 (12) 12 (15) 15 (17) 15 (18)
 Bachelor or equivalent 139 (42) 37 (45) 34 (41) 36 (42) 32 (39)
 Postgraduate/professional training 118 (35) 33 (40) 31 (38) 24 (28) 30 (36)
 No response 3 (1) 0 (0) 2 (2) 1 (1) 0 (0)
Ethnoracial identification§§ X2 (6, n=334)=5.37, p=0.50
 White, n (%) 198 (59) 50 (60) 54 (66) 43 (50) 51 (61)
 Asian, n (%) 87 (26) 22 (27) 16 (20) 28 (33) 21 (25)
 Other/multiple selections/did not answer, n (%) 49 (15) 11 (13) 12 (15) 15 (17) 11 (13)
Marital status¶ X 2 (9, n=334)=6.95, p=0.64
 Married, n (%) 187 (56) 49 (59) 48 (59) 43 (50) 47 (57)
 Separated/divorced/widowed, n (%) 26 (8) 7 (8) 6 (7) 5 (6) 8 (10)
 Single, n (%) 115 (34) 27 (33) 25 (30) 36 (42) 27 (33)
 Other/refused to/did not answer, n (%) 6 (2) 0 (0) 3 (4) 2 (2) 1 (1)
LCAT X 2 (6, n=334)=10.22, p=0.12
 1, n (%) 19 (6) 2 (2) 4 (5) 8 (9) 5 (6)
 2, n (%) 172 (51) 36 (43) 49 (60) 46 (53) 41 (49)
 3, n (%) 143 (43) 45 (54) 29 (35) 32 (37) 37 (45)

Note: data are presented for all participants (all) and separated by randomisation group (waitlist control (WLC); high intensity interval training (HIIT); yoga (yoga); combination (HIIT+yoga)). All group comparisons between continuous variables were complete using one-way analyses of variance; the comparisons between categorical variables were done using χ2 tests.

*For details of how the categories were formed, please see online supplemental table S3.

†For details of how the categories were formed, please see online supplemental table S4.

‡For details of how the categories were formed, please see online supplemental table S5.

§For details of how the categories were formed, please see online supplemental table S6.

¶For details of how the categories were formed, please see online supplemental table S7.

CESD, Centre for Epidemiological Studies – Depression Scale; LCAT, Stanford Leisure Time Activity Categorical Item.