Table 2.

Estimates for trajectories for WLC (A) and comparisons with active treatment groups (B1–3)

	Estimate	SE	95% CI
A. Estimates, SE and 95% CI for intercept (I), slope (S) and quadratic (Q) terms for WLC
I	10.34	0.60	9.15 to 11.49
S	−0.15	0.26	−0.65 to 0.38
Q	−0.01	0.04	−0.09 to 0.07
B. Estimates for differences between each group and WLC
B1. Differences in estimates for I
HIIT versus WLC	0.26	0.87	−1.46 to 1.97
Yoga versus WLC	−0.34	0.86	−2.02 to 1.34
HIIT+yoga versus WLC	−1.27	0.83	−2.89 to 0.35
B2. Differences in estimates for S
HIIT versus WLC	−0.77	0.38	−1.51 to −0.04
Yoga versus WLC	−0.70	0.40	−1.49 to 0.08
HIIT+yoga versus WLC	−0.92	0.39	−1.69 to −0.14
B3. Differences in estimates for Q
HIIT versus WLC	0.11	0.06	0.00 to 0.22
Yoga versus WLC	0.08	0.06	−0.05 to 0.20
HIIT+yoga versus WLC	0.11	0.06	−0.01 to 0.23

Results from the SEM model estimating intercept, slope and quadratic term for WLC (section A) and comparisons of these estimates with those of the three active groups (HIIT, yoga, HIIT+yoga; section B). Bold text denotes p<0.05.

HIIT, high intensity interval training; SEM, structural equation model; WLC, waitlist control.