Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 10;12(5):1930–1943. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab027

TABLE 3.

GRADE evidence profile for outcomes of this systematic review of RUTF containing low or no dairy for children with severe acute malnutrition1

Quality assessment Number of participants Effect
No. of studies Design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations RUTF <50%2 Standard RUTF Relative (95% CI) Absolute Quality
Weight gain (better indicated by higher values)
 6 RCTs and cluster-RCTs No serious risk of bias No serious inconsistency No serious indirectness No serious imprecision None 2366 2185 SMD 0.20 lower (0.26 to 0.15 lower) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ High
Recovery
 4 RCTs and cluster-RCTs No serious risk of bias No serious inconsistency Serious3 No serious imprecision None 1941/2597 (74.7%) 1811/2328 (77.8%) RR 0.93 (0.87 to 1.00) 54 fewer per 1000 (from 101 fewer to 0 fewer) ⊕⊕⊕Ο Moderate
Time to recovery (better indicated by lower values)
 4 RCTs and cluster-RCTs Serious4 Serious5 Serious3 Serious6 None 1292 1129 SMD 0.20 higher (0.01 lower to 0.41 higher) ⊕ΟΟΟ Very low
Mortality
 5 RCTs and cluster-RCTs Serious4 No serious inconsistency No serious indirectness Serious6 None 111/2635 (4.2%) 108/2369 (4.6%) RR 1.11 (0.85 to 1.44) 5 more per 1000 (from 6 fewer to 20 more) ⊕⊕ΟΟ Low
Default
 3 RCTs and cluster-RCTs Serious4 No serious inconsistency No serious indirectness Serious6 None 307/1668 (18.4%) 240/1384 (17.3%) RR 1.16 (0.99 to 1.35) 28 more per 1000 (from 2 fewer to 61 more) ⊕⊕ΟΟ Low
Nonresponse
 4 RCTs and cluster-RCTs No serious risk of bias No serious inconsistency No serious indirectness Serious6 None 151/2633 (5.7%) 108/2332 (4.6%) RR 1.36 (0.95 to 1.94) 17 more per 1000 (from 24 fewer to 44 more) ⊕⊕⊕Ο Moderate
Weight-for-height z scores (better indicated by higher values)
 4 RCTs Serious4 No serious inconsistency No serious indirectness Serious6 None 1099 1117 MD 0.01 higher (0.12 lower to 0.14 higher) ⊕⊕ΟΟ Low
Midupper arm circumference (better indicated by higher values)
 4 RCTs No serious risk of bias Serious5 Serious7 No serious imprecision None 1099 1117 MD 0.06 lower (0.25 lower to 0.13 higher) ⊕⊕ΟΟ Low
Weight-for-age z scores (better indicated by higher values)
 3 RCTs No serious risk of bias No serious inconsistency No serious indirectness Serious6 None 1063 1079 MD 0.10 lower (0.20 lower to 0 higher) ⊕⊕⊕Ο Moderate
Height-for-age z scores (better indicated by higher values)
 4 RCTs No serious risk of bias No serious inconsistency No serious indirectness Serious6 None 1099 1117 MD 0.02 lower (0.10 lower to 0.05 higher) ⊕⊕⊕Ο Moderate
1

GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; MD, mean difference; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RR, risk ratio; RUTF, ready-to-use therapeutic food; SMD, standardized mean difference.

2

Definition of recovery varies between studies.

3

The amount of data from studies with a high risk of bias may affect the interpretation of results.

4

Substantial unexplained statistical heterogeneity.

5

Wide CI around the estimate of the effect.

6

Differences in outcome measurement (change over time and absolute values).

7

RUTF <50% represents RUTF with <50% of protein coming from dairy products.