Table 2. Relative abundance of cecal microbiota of mice of Con and PGA groups.
| Phylum / Family | Con | PGA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Actinobacteria | 40.55 ± 6.37 | 15.70 ± 3.28** | |
| Bifidobacteriaceae | 34.41 ± 5.8 | 15.21 ± 3.28* | |
| Coriobacteriaceae | 6.13 ± 1.3 | 0.49 ± 0.09** | |
| Bacteroidetes | 7.60 ± 1.03 | 21.60 ± 1.98** | |
| Bacteroidaceae | 4.2 ± 0.75 | 5.57 ± 0.59 | |
| Rikenellaceae | 1.26 ± 0.25 | 0.84 ± 0.15 | |
| S24-7 | 1.23 ± 0.2 | 12.06 ± 1.05** | |
| Paraprevotellaceae | 0.91 ± 0.4 | 3.12 ± 0.79 | |
| Firmicutes | 51.59 ± 5.96 | 62.64 ± 2.65 | |
| Bacillaceae | 0 | 3.81 ± 0.38** | |
| Lactobacillaceae | 14.15 ± 1.93 | 9.19 ± 4.28 | |
| Streptococcaceae | 0.11 ± 0.04 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | |
| Turicibacteraceae | 0.68 ± 0.59 | 0 | |
| Christensenellaceae | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0 | |
| Clostridiaceae | 3.11 ± 1.64 | 0 | |
| Dehalobacteriaceae | 0.01 ± 0.003 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | |
| Lachnospiraceae | 9.15 ± 1.87 | 15.18 ± 1.72* | |
| Peptococcaceae | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | |
| Ruminococcaceae | 3.82 ± 0.74 | 2.97 ± 0.3 | |
| Mogibacteriaceae | 0.11 ± 0.03 | 0.45 ± 0.05** | |
| Erysipelotrichaceae | 15.97 ± 2.83 | 15.15 ± 3.3 | |
| Proteobacteria | 0.26 ± 0.21 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | |
| Comamonadaceae | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.003 | |
| Enterobacteriaceae | 0.21 ± 0.21 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | |
Con group: standard diet; PGA group: 30% high-γ-PGA natto diet.
**p<0.01 as compared with Con group, *p<0.05 as compared with Con group.
Values are expressed as mean ± SE (n=7).