Skip to main content
. 2021 May 11;40(4):176–185. doi: 10.12938/bmfh.2020-061

Table 2. Relative abundance of cecal microbiota of mice of Con and PGA groups.

Phylum / Family Con PGA
Actinobacteria 40.55 ± 6.37 15.70 ± 3.28**
Bifidobacteriaceae 34.41 ± 5.8 15.21 ± 3.28*
Coriobacteriaceae 6.13 ± 1.3 0.49 ± 0.09**
Bacteroidetes 7.60 ± 1.03 21.60 ± 1.98**
Bacteroidaceae 4.2 ± 0.75 5.57 ± 0.59
Rikenellaceae 1.26 ± 0.25 0.84 ± 0.15
S24-7 1.23 ± 0.2 12.06 ± 1.05**
Paraprevotellaceae 0.91 ± 0.4 3.12 ± 0.79
Firmicutes 51.59 ± 5.96 62.64 ± 2.65
Bacillaceae 0 3.81 ± 0.38**
Lactobacillaceae 14.15 ± 1.93 9.19 ± 4.28
Streptococcaceae 0.11 ± 0.04 0.02 ± 0.01
Turicibacteraceae 0.68 ± 0.59 0
Christensenellaceae 0.03 ± 0.01 0
Clostridiaceae 3.11 ± 1.64 0
Dehalobacteriaceae 0.01 ± 0.003 0.02 ± 0.01
Lachnospiraceae 9.15 ± 1.87 15.18 ± 1.72*
Peptococcaceae 0.02 ± 0.01 0.03 ± 0.01
Ruminococcaceae 3.82 ± 0.74 2.97 ± 0.3
Mogibacteriaceae 0.11 ± 0.03 0.45 ± 0.05**
Erysipelotrichaceae 15.97 ± 2.83 15.15 ± 3.3
Proteobacteria 0.26 ± 0.21 0.06 ± 0.01
Comamonadaceae 0.04 ± 0.01 0.04 ± 0.003
Enterobacteriaceae 0.21 ± 0.21 0.01 ± 0.01

Con group: standard diet; PGA group: 30% high-γ-PGA natto diet.

**p<0.01 as compared with Con group, *p<0.05 as compared with Con group.

Values are expressed as mean ± SE (n=7).