Table 2.
Tissue dose used | Number of case/deaths | ERR/Gy (+95% CI) | p-valuea | Inter-cohort heterogeneity p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
All lymphoma | ||||
Active bone marrow dose | 474 | −0.031 (−0.237, 0.251) | 0.805 | 0.084 |
Lymphocyte dose | 0.135 (−0.205, 0.621) | 0.498 | 0.105 | |
Lymphatic tissue dose | 0.492 (−0.067, 1.332) | 0.096 | 0.340b | |
| ||||
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma + CLL | ||||
Active bone marrow dose | 376 | 0.050 (−0.189, 0.387) | 0.726 | 0.154b |
Lymphocyte dose | 0.294 (−0.114, 0.889) | 0.190 | 0.377b | |
Lymphatic tissue dose | 0.790 (0.083, 1.882) | 0.022 | 0.862b | |
| ||||
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma | ||||
Active bone marrow dose | 342 | 0.019 (−0.224, 0.370) | 0.896 | 0.333b |
Lymphocyte dose | 0.219 (−0.189, 0.828) | 0.352 | 0.515b | |
Lymphatic tissue dose | 0.631 (−0.045, 1.704) | 0.074 | 0.854b | |
| ||||
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia | ||||
Active bone marrow dose | 34 | 0.331 (−0.989c, 2.283) | 0.504 | 0.774b |
Lymphocyte dose | 1.113b (−1.888c, 5.329) | 0.212b | 0.914b | |
Lymphatic tissue dose | 4.511 (−0.031, 20.020) | 0.055 | 0.800b | |
| ||||
Hodgkin lymphoma | ||||
Active bone marrow dose | 71 | −0.080 (−0.711c, 0.846) | 0.825 | 0.900b |
Lymphocyte dose | −0.024 (−1.309c, 1.858) | 0.975 | 0.896b | |
Lymphatic tissue dose | 0.492 (−2.426c, 5.855) | 0.749 | 0.911b | |
| ||||
Multiple myeloma | ||||
Active bone marrow dose | 96 | −0.043 (−0.655c, 0.808) | 0.890 | 0.964a |
Lymphocyte dose | 0.070 (−0.938c, 1.434) | 0.877 | 0.970a | |
Lymphatic tissue dose | 0.281 (−1.130c, 2.489) | 0.640 | 0.983a |
Obtained by fitting linear relative risk model, allowing for separate risk for diagnostically-exposed cohorts (Massachusetts TB, Canadian TB, US scoliosis), therapeutically-exposed cohorts (Israeli tinea capitis, Rochester thymus) and Japanese atomic bomb survivor Life Span Study (LSS), stratifying by cohort, sex, age and year of follow-up (using intervals of age and year of follow-up defined by person-year table, as in Appendix A Table A1). The six cohorts included in this analysis are those for which doses to the lymphoid system can be approximated from ABM doses (see Appendix B). Unless otherwise stated, all confidence intervals are based on the profile likelihood.
p-value of improvement in fit over null model (without dose trend).
indications of non-convergence
Wald-based CI